Fool
Whiny Bitch
@nytimes wrote piece implying that because Don was giving testimony, he must be a “RAT.”
It's pretty clear he said that the NYT made an implication, at least based on this quote. Not sure how you're misconstruing it.
@nytimes wrote piece implying that because Don was giving testimony, he must be a “RAT.”
The brits have a well documented history of poor reading skills.
It doesn't need interpretation. It's clear as day. Words have meaning.
He called John Dean a Rat.
k
The fact that we now have conservatives agreeing that this conversation needs to be compared with watergate is significant. More significant is we have people that weren't born when Nixon was abusing the office, saying he did nothing wrong.
These are the same people calling others "sheep"