I believe in evidence, not accusations. Why is his denial less credible to you than her accusation?
It's not. I think they are both to certain extents credible. JK denies it outright and that's fine. Ford says it happened and that's also fine. The end result is you need to investigate it and do interviews with people who might have heard about it back in the 80s, friends, relatives, therapists, etc. You know who's really good at that? The FBI.
Fool said:I've said nothing to discredit her, I haven't attacked her character, or called her a liar. I've said there's no proof of anything, which is factually correct.
Then who said this?
Gotta admit, it's a darn good bluff. Just enough details to convince retards devoid of critical thinking skills that a crime must have happened, but absolutely no details that can be disproved due to their vagueness.
Fool said:You keep saying it needs to be investigated, and I've asked you repeatedly how. There is nothing to go off of.
And I've told you repeatedly how, like in this post, you interview everyone involved, friends, relatives, classmates. The FBI specializes in "nothing to go off of", they're the fucking FBI. That's the job.
People like yourself would never work for the FBI because you'd see a murder and be like "Welp we can't ask a dead guy who did it, CASE CLOSED!"
Last edited: