Originally Posted by phaytal

Well it's pretty ****ing cut and dry here. Oregon law prohibits business owners from discriminating based on sexual orientation, among other things such as race and religion.

Perhaps these uppity Christians should have kept their mouth shut as to why they were denying service to these particular people instead of campaigning on social media against the big bad gays that wanted a cake.

oh you don't say



and we wonder how we get to this point

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y70Q6tQQmw

actual book burning LOLOLOLO

oh sam hyde you punked their entire country

it'll be alright tele, have a cake

hope it doesn't have dairy

Milk: The new symbol of racism in Donald Trump***8217;s America

WUT: College Student Explains Why Milk Is Racist | Daily Wire

or that is hate speech cael

now pay me

this is like that time i reminded ztir that maybe he should stfu about tehvul

or me and red might have to remind ztir that he lives in canada

and as a white male he can't talk like that to someone like ZHER over the internet

Originally Posted by Captain Tele

it is ok coombz

keep your bank accounts full

your bull**** will catch u one day soon

top names in your country all belong to asians anyways

i hope they hold you to your **** very soon

you keep holding onto that hope, if it makes you feel any better in your ****ty and insignificant life

Originally Posted by Captain Tele

oh you don't say

That hotel must be in the heartland...



... of the Middle East.

actually, the hotel hateigloo is in downtown ottawa

make america turkish again

we gotta start acting like the muslims

Originally Posted by phaytal

Well it's pretty ****ing cut and dry here. Oregon law prohibits business owners from discriminating based on sexual orientation, among other things such as race and religion.

Perhaps these uppity Christians should have kept their mouth shut as to why they were denying service to these particular people instead of campaigning on social media against the big bad gays that wanted a cake.

It's not quite black and white, that's why another case just like it made it's way to the Supreme Court and is awaiting a decision.

Originally Posted by amRam

It's not quite black and white, that's why another case just like it made it's way to the Supreme Court and is awaiting a decision.

isn't the other case different, because in Colorado (as opposed to Oregon) the gays aren't a protected class?

i know, i know, reading is hard...

Originally Posted by amRam

It's not quite black and white, that's why another case just like it made it's way to the Supreme Court and is awaiting a decision.

It is black and white at this point. If the Oregon cake people want to challenge the state ruling in federal court, they certainly can. I think they'll have a harder time overturning the verdict as the doxxing was a big part of the ruling, which is not the case with the Colorado case.

As far as state law goes, it's perfectly clear.

plz don't bother trying to explain federalism to amram he's an idiot

Originally Posted by phaytal

It is black and white at this point. If the Oregon cake people want to challenge the state ruling in federal court, they certainly can. I think they'll have a harder time overturning the verdict as the doxxing was a big part of the ruling, which is not the case with the Colorado case.

As far as state law goes, it's perfectly clear.

Again, the SCOTUS wouldn't be hearing it if anything was perfectly clear, and they're reportedly split on the decision. Nothing about this is black and white, and that's painfully ****ing obvious considering it's gone all the way to the top court and left even those judges divided.

It's not a simple issue at all. Not sure why you're arguing against that.

thank you for your expert analysis, Canadian Juggernaught

he doesn't get the difference between the state and federal court systems

Originally Posted by cael

he doesn't get the difference between the state and federal court systems

Lmao you got noooo ****ing clue what's happening do you

Originally Posted by amRam

Again, the SCOTUS wouldn't be hearing it if anything was perfectly clear, and they're reportedly split on the decision. Nothing about this is black and white, and that's painfully ****ing obvious considering it's gone all the way to the top court and left even those judges divided.

It's not a simple issue at all. Not sure why you're arguing against that.

Of course they are split. Half of the SCOTUS thinks Jesus is more important than the rights of human beings.

Originally Posted by phaytal

Of course they are split. Half of the SCOTUS thinks Jesus is more important than the rights of human beings.

That's the country you live in dude.

But it's ok guys, according to cael the SCOTUS has no impact on state courts!!!

yes, it has no bearing on oregon law unless they're specifically challenging the constitutionality of the law in federal court jfc