I change my vote now that I think about it. I originally said don't ban them because free speech. but now that I remember that tehvul has left like 50 times and come back, and actually asked rayn to permaban him on multiple occasions, I say just ban tehvul. I already have dweasel ignored so that's a non issue since everyone else does too and his posts rarely get responded to.
It's not like they'd be hard to identify.if u ban them, you'll be chasing smurfs around for months
He couldn't go a week without posting a link to one of his shitty YouTube videos.tehvul2 would just tell us all directly because he'd get the sudden inexplicable idea that we actually love him and want to listen to what he says.
?can u unban my rm pls
I don't support banning on TW because people don't 'like' someone or they find them annoying.
Banning should be for policy violations.
I find many people annoying here, I don't even use the ignore button, I am mature enough to be able to just not read what they write skip and over it, even those that post the super long repeating pics or text wall, and move on.
If we start banning everyone based on their posts, the amount of posts and how much they are 'liked' it's going to get pretty boring after awhile.
...but hey let's just get in line with the rest of the mainstream internet where we moderate who and what can be said and talked about and stick to knitting and cooking shall we because we sure don't want to annoy people. </tonguecheek>
his family is causing rayn shit in real life.