THE ELECTION TRANSITION INTEGRITY THREAD

in 2024 trump WILL be the first candidate to win the popular vote

it's unheard of

no one's thought of winning the election by getting more votes
 
'Historically strange' spike in incomplete Nevada voter files, casinos as home

...She found that in the last presidential election, there were 68 voter registrations missing the critical data. In 2020, it was 13,372...In her affidavit, which has been forwarded to Trump’s team, Morgan said that her findings were just scratching surface.

“Based on the results I have found in the limited time I have had to analyze this dataset, I expect to find additional oddities in the election data as I conduct further analysis,” she wrote...

Pictures for those who don't read.

90
 
Last edited:
whats even more fucked up is that they planned for trump to lose but then win in this manner
 
strange that people in nevada of all places would be living in trailer parks and casinos. glad we caught that detail scotus will be interested to hear
 
Last edited:
looks like hearsay let's see the servers. hoping these judges have their head in a "never been in their own ass" state, and that they don't have children

Kinda seems like you don't know what "hearsay" means.

I agree a bad judge can be problematic for justice, but that's true of any legal matter and it's why we have an appeals process. Even a great judge gets it wrong sometimes.
 
Kinda seems like you don't know what "hearsay" means.

I agree a bad judge can be problematic for justice, but that's true of any legal matter and it's why we have an appeals process. Even a great judge gets it wrong sometimes.

i read the PDF and while very convincing, the cort will demand proofs

edit- i said "looks like hearsay" so yes, i did not know what the term meant but imagine there is a similar term for "talking out of your ass"
 
Last edited:
i read the PDF and while very convincing, the cort will demand proofs

edit- i said "looks like hearsay" so yes, i did not know what the term meant but imagine there is a similar term for "talking out of your ass"

He's an industry expert, has done this type of work for the government before, and even NYT likes him. He made it pretty clear that he has independently analyzed the available data, and would continue to do so if additional data was made available by the court. That's basically the opposite of talking out of your ass.

Also, a signed affidavit is a legal document and a form of proof, where courts are concerned. It is written testimony.
 
He's an industry expert, has done this type of work for the government before, and even NYT likes him. He made it pretty clear that he has independently analyzed the available data, and would continue to do so if additional data was made available by the court. That's basically the opposite of talking out of your ass.

Also, a signed affidavit is a legal document and a form of proof, where courts are concerned. It is written testimony.

you are preaching to the choir - i want to see what he has to say - that can be substantiated in court. unless that evidence is allowed, it is effectively "talking out of your ass", especially if the court trashes the "case" or whatever that his affidavit was filed in. take your pic of the three:
-fukin normies mate i swear
-fuking repuplicans mate i swear
-fukin honkies mate i swear
 
tfw the kia that has subverted selections around the world has been employed by (((business interests))) to subvert your own
 
Back
Top