[Mega] MAGA Super Trump Mega Thread



The re-classifed emails totaled 2000. You were speaking on less than a 100. Even with the 2000 re-classified later, the FBI had a flimsy case of both obstruction of justice and intentionally mishandling classified information.

When are you locking her up?
 
The FBI determined that the illegality(if any) wasn't worth pursuing charges.

Only it's not the FBI's job to determine whether to pursue charges, that's the responsibility of the DOJ. It's up to the FBI to determine whether there is evidence of crimes committed, and they testified that several were.
 
The re-classifed emails totaled 2000. You were speaking on less than a 100. Even with the 2000 re-classified later, the FBI had a flimsy case of both obstruction of justice and intentionally mishandling classified information.

When are you locking her up?

So



Fucking



Stupid
 
Only it's not the FBI's job to determine whether to pursue charges, that's the responsibility of the DOJ. It's up to the FBI to determine whether there is evidence of crimes committed, and they testified that several were.

Semantics. Comey recommended to the DoJ that it's not worth pursuing charges.
 
I haven't seen this much goalpost moving in a long time

Frankly I'm surprised he's still here posting at all



jgrange quickly switch to caelpost-mode
 
Semantics. Comey recommended to the DoJ that it's not worth pursuing charges.

Comey also stated that crimes were committed. The part that you ignore and lie about blatantly. The DOJ was never going to pursue Hillary, and frankly it's easy to understand why. Indicting your own Presidential candidate weeks before a "97% victory!"? No chance in hell. She could've been on video deleting subpoenaed emails herself and cackling and they would not have pursued it. As to why Trump isn't? Optics. It doesn't do him any good to pursue a now politically irrelevant never-was and risk the poor optics of even potentially locking up a political opponent.

Regardless of all of that, it doesn't excuse your retarded behavior. Just admit you were wrong and shut the fuck up. You can come back in a few days and say something stupid again.
 
u guys can't even lock up anthony weiner for the same crime how are we supposed to take u guys srsly

huma abedin had all the top lockdown resources in the world, direct access to the clinton cartel's goons, and still couldn't keep the weiner locked up

u can't expect mere mortals who don't even have the mighty power of jihad 2 succeed where huma failed
 
Moving the goal posts means I've changed my goals since this discussion started which isn't the case. The point still remains - there is barely anything at all to locking Hillary up for intentionally mishandling classified information and even for obstruction of justice.

When will she be getting locked up? 2018? 2019? 2056?
 
Comey also stated that crimes were committed. The part that you ignore and lie about blatantly. The DOJ was never going to pursue Hillary, and frankly it's easy to understand why. Indicting your own Presidential candidate weeks before a "97% victory!"? No chance in hell. She could've been on video deleting subpoenaed emails herself and cackling and they would not have pursued it. As to why Trump isn't? Optics. It doesn't do him any good to pursue a now politically irrelevant never-was and risk the poor optics of even potentially locking up a political opponent.

Regardless of all of that, it doesn't excuse your retarded behavior. Just admit you were wrong and shut the fuck up. You can come back in a few days and say something stupid again.
capout

shutout
 
hey jgrange, i'm curious to know how you feel about Loretta Lynch meeting secretly with WJC on a tarmac days before Comey announced his findings and judgment.
 
Comey also stated that crimes were committed. The part that you ignore and lie about blatantly.

Regardless of all of that, it doesn't excuse your retarded behavior. Just admit you were wrong and shut the fuck up. You can come back in a few days and say something stupid again.

Not enough to warrant locking her up, apparently, which was my stance the entire time. I haven't been wrong. There was nothing there to locking her up for any significant amount of time. At worst, she would've lost her clearance or gotten a fine.

No locking up happened or will happen. Suck it up, buttercup.
 
Less than 100 email convo chains out of 30,000+ emails. Lock her up!

LMAO

this isn't how this works

it isn't ok because a small % of your total emails were compromised

you can't legally send classified emails through a non-classified system

this is a fucking crime........1 email is a crime and an issue

100 just proves absolute negligence and/or intent to not follow protocols

the fact that you work for the DoD and say this just proves how full of shit you are, or why you need more Opsec training, another training module about IA, or how just straight up bad you are at your own job.

I pray you don't have a SIPRNET account or access

You know damn well what would happen to you if you sent even one classified email through your NMCI machine accidentally.
 
i'm not jgrange but i will tell u i feel heartbroken and betrayed

willy said that cigar was special for me :( :(
 
Not enough to warrant locking her up, apparently, which was my stance the entire time. I haven't been wrong. There was nothing there to locking her up for any significant amount of time. At worst, she would've lost her clearance or gotten a fine.

No locking up happened or will happen. Suck it up, buttercup.

Sub sailors photo case draws comparisons to Clinton emails - POLITICO

the more you knew

that is a link btw....you click on it to read

fake laughing at politico doesn't change the content of the discussion (again)
 
The lonely cuck has spent his entire day sperging in this thread :lol:





#sad
 
Back
Top