Good news everyone!
Don't think for one second i am defending the dude that did this because i am not. The fucking guy should have removed them prior to this guest coming into his home.Yeah I don't think this is an argument you want to take up SamUwell nobody should be hiding a camera in a Kleenex box to spy on company/employees using their restrooms in their house. I think that's an invasion of privacy
I noticed that too.The only time I break from this hardline libertarian stuff though is if kids are involved. If the nanny was under 18 and this happened, it would not really upset me. But since she's 18 the government can fuck off.
Yeah... because this adult female was hired and worked out of his home, Im curious if his residency must be treated as a place of business and during times where someone is employed, he loses his personal rights to his property?She's an employee using the restroom in the workplace. It's not apples to apples with traditional employment/workplaces (or maybe there is a contract involved - who knows) but it's fucking bizarre and apparently enough people agree that it's an unwarranted invasion of (reasonably expected) privacy.
Good news everyone!
If you want to abuse an elderly or a child, make sure you do it in the bathroom because apparently, you are not allowed to have a camera in your very own bathroom in the house you are buying from the banks and leasing from the State.
thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, seventeen, eighteen, nineteen. notice a pattern?I noticed that too.
Why did the media use teen when she is an adult woman? The headline reads like it was a young teenager. And, what if she was? What if this kid had sex in his room and his camera caught it? Would he charged with child pornography?
It looks like if you think your personal rights extend to videotaping people changing/pooping while they use your personal/work restroom and without their knowledge or consent...you would be correct.This is a big overreach of power for the government.
Yeah... because this adult female was hired and worked out of his home, Im curious if his residency must be treated as a place of business and during times where someone is employed, he loses his personal rights to his property?