“The success rate for day traders is estimated to be around only 10%, so … 90% are losing money.”* Cory Michael at Vantage Point Trading is even more pessimistic (or realistic) when he says, “Only 1% of [day] traders really make money.”* He says it’s because of the “social mood.” *Put simply, by definition, if you are buying, someone else must be selling; that is the social part.* The markets are a real-time thermometer; buying and selling, action and reaction.* If someone is making money, someone else is losing money.* You would have to join the crowd as the market is moving up and be smarter than that crowd to get out before they do, if it starts to fall.
All scenarios, and income potential, are assuming you are one of the few day traders who reaches this level and can make a living from the markets. At the beginning of article it was stated that*a large group of day traders fail…only about 4% of people who attempt day trading*will even be profitable. The very profitable traders are a smaller percentage.
KittyCat said:You do realize I'm wealthy from day trading
I'm not trying to brag since idc and rather live poor simple lifestyle
I just dont get you trying to perpetuate this in on welfare thing when other ppl here know it's not true
I think it's hilarious tho keep posting it
At least keep the bank teller troll it is funny hehe
Holy shit havax and supertrap furiously googling shit to use against me
Triggered
It's (willfully) ignorant to point to chicago and say that gun control legislation is ineffective, because the regulations are so easily circumvented by purchases outside the city/state. There may as well be no stronger legislation at all.
It's overly simplistic to say that due to the ubiquity of firearms in the US population that gun control is unenforceable. Yes, criminals won't be handing in their guns for credit. And yet, the existing firearm amounts would decrease over time (probably a long time).
I don't have a strong opinion one way or another on gun control, but I do think it's dishonest of gun-rights folks to deny the societal consequences of their preference (more deaths, higher non-stranger homicide rates, expanded capacity of mass homicide)
you would need one tbh
and it is a silly argument to say that gun control doesn't work as long as other states can own guns........because when that fails (which it will) it is like saying that gun control doesn't work until all nations have banned them
until, wait for it, weapons and war are illegal
so all you really ask for and demand is world peace
and good fucking luck with that small task (while living in country that survives off of arms trade and global chaos)
"Chelsea Handler quits doing something she's bad at to focus on doing something she's worse at."
this post reeks of bullshit. what does gun control "failing" mean. they get illegally brought in? It would radically reduce their number and increase their cost, making their purchase & use for typical crime unrealistic
of course, it sounds to me like you're arguing that they would come in from another country, so why even ban then at all?
Let's apply that logic to illegal immigrants: why even restrict their movement, if they're just gonna keep coming anyways? What good is a wall, if the forces that compel them to come are still in place?
see, your logic is full of holes dipshit
this post reeks of bullshit.
what does gun control "failing" mean. they get illegally brought in?
to fall short of success or achievement in something expected, attempted, desired, or approved:
It would radically reduce their number and increase their cost, making their purchase & use for typical crime unrealistic
of course, it sounds to me like you're arguing that they would come in from another country, so why even ban then at all?
Let's apply that logic to illegal immigrants: why even restrict their movement, if they're just gonna keep coming anyways? What good is a wall, if the forces that compel them to come are still in place?
see, your logic is full of holes dipshit
Since when do illegals have US citizen Rights???
Conflation, talk about bullshit
lol holy shit
you know what the best part about this is?
California and San Francisco suing Trump administration over funding fight - LA Times
Federal Court In San Francisco Blocks Trump's Threat Against Sanctuary Cities : The Two-Way : NPR
he says this from deep within the confines of a city doing this
OMG IMMIGRATION DOESN"T WORK
BUT WE MUST STOP THE FEDS, TRUMP, ICE, and become sanctuary not just city but STATE in order to stop this guy
LMAO
it is one thing to be full of shit. it is another to be full of shit but go full speed ahead with it anyways.
this is chode proving "i don't really care about gun control that much"
but here is me fighting to the end of the world to shovel shit for that agenda anyways