Quote:
Originally Posted by WildKnight
just got back to this thread. i laugh at your ignorance of your own evidence!
if you fully understood what you wrote, you would know that article talks about how neanderthals migrated and intermingled with anatomically modern humans. this would make the statement that anatomically modern humans and neanderthals were seperate genomes and lived together and mingled in the same periods. as opposed to the "from africa" theory which is currently widely accepted, where modern humanity absorbed neanderthals and then spread out from africa.
the only thing your "evidence" suggests. is that some neanderthals migrated out of africa before the genetic dissolution of neanderthal. and modern humans bred with them. which could wholly be the case, but the claim that africans are not made up of neanderthal dna couldn't be further from the truth. africans just like all other modern humans, are at least partially made up of neanderthals, there is no exception to this for any race of modern human.
|
Not a single thing you said actual matches up with anything anyone has ever concluded about Neanderthals and their role in early human history. What the study shows doesn't even contradict the Out of Africa theory anyway. Not sure why you made that assertion. Probably because you're an intellectually dishonest liberal retard.
Neanderthals were absorbed IN AFRICA, huh? So weird that Africans don't carry any of the DNA then.
I love how you're putting quotations around 'evidence' as if PhD from Harvard (on some occasions I'd agree, but not when it's based off of actual DNA evidence) is suspect because it doesn't align with your social beliefs that ******s are just really tan white people.
I guess part of your claim is correct however: "...there is no exception to this for any race of modern human." You're right. ******s aren't modern humans; they're one step below.