Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
TribalWar Forums
Page 25 of 626

TribalWar Forums (https://www.tribalwar.com/forums/index.php)
-   TWHOF (https://www.tribalwar.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=275)
-   -   This is for you Trump voters. (https://www.tribalwar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=683482)

Flipp 03-22-2016 19:35

lukkin 4ward 2 mo trumpslides 2n8 :king:

havax 03-22-2016 20:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoMo (Post 18544745)
Jews dig the Trumpinator.

Trump Yarmulkes Are Biggest Seller at AIPAC Conference

http://freebeacon.com/issues/trump-y...ac-conference/


If yarmulke sales are any indication of voter attitudes, Donald Trump was the clear winner at AIPAC on Monday night.

Marc Daniels, a vendor selling campaign logo kippas outside the American Israel Public Affairs Committee conference in Washington, D.C. on Monday evening, said the “Donald Trump 2016” cap was his most popular item by far.

Daniels said he was “inundated” with requests for the Trump yarmulkes from conference-goers and sold out almost immediately.

“I totally underestimated the degree of support that Jewish people who are attending this event have for Trump,” said Daniels, who runs an online yarmulke shop called Marc’s Garden Jubilee. “I probably had about 50 inquiries for Trump yarmulkes that I could not fulfill.”

Daniels said he sold two or three Ted Cruz yarmulkes and three or four for John Kasich. By 8 p.m. on Monday, the vendor said he only had Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders caps left over, and was finding those tougher to unload.

Trump, Cruz, Kasich and Clinton spoke at the AIPAC Policy Conference on Monday. Sanders did not attend the event.

http://s2.freebeacon.com/up/2016/03/...rcyarmulke.jpg

**** those ****ing jews.

they ruin EVERYTHING!

we don't want your support! this is all on purpose, paid for by liberal jews.

Reggs 03-22-2016 21:51

I think Trump makes a lot of jews feel awkward. He's said a lot of things the jews would not like at all, but they love that he hates muslims and thinks the gloves should come off when it comes to Palestine.

I bet there's a lot of jew-banter going on over the dinner table about Trump when they eat that god awful food in their smelly jew homes.

naptown 03-22-2016 21:54

our beloved allies

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CeMWaGiUkAEyORP.jpg:large

Captain Tele 03-22-2016 21:55

Ughhh...

Trump at AIPAC

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trump
I love the people in this room. I love Israel. I love Israel. I’ve been with Israel so long in terms of I’ve received some of my greatest honors from Israel, my father before me, incredible. My daughter, Ivanka, is about to have a beautiful Jewish baby.

(CHEERS, APPLAUSE)

In fact, it could be happening right now, which would be very nice as far as I’m concerned.

(LAUGHTER)

So I want to thank you very much. This has been a truly great honor. Thank you, everybody. Thank you.

Thank you very much.

(CHEERS, APPLAUSE)

He appears to be only marginally less of a sell out on this issue than Hillary

Would give props to Bernie on this one....but he is a Jew

Reggs 03-22-2016 22:01

Everyone has to do the jew cowtowing. When RON PAUL(!) was running I remembered there was some video where he flat out wouldn't talk about aid to Israel. It's political death even for givesno****s candidates like Ron Paul.

Vanster 03-22-2016 22:22

http://l1.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/ql...392294c7b4fa11

Captain Tele 03-22-2016 22:47

seems legit

imagine if your people smoke signaled about the approaching marauder horde before it was too late

before we took your safe zones, killed your bison for fun, made contests out of making your ancestors cry and prove just how badly we could **** your people over

i can see why you dislike Trump for his ominous but clearly accurate forwarnings though

maybe you should show similar disdain for fundy muslims as you do for christians

condemn their barbarianism as much as you do white rednecks

maybe learn something....one day

or not and vote for Hillary :lolque:

Greedo909 03-23-2016 00:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanster (Post 18544813)

PIERS MORGAN: When it comes to terror, isn’t it time we started listening seriously to Trump?

JoMo 03-23-2016 00:36

Trump gonna win AZ easily. I thought it would be closer but it's already called and pretty sure people are still voting.

havax 03-23-2016 00:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vanster (Post 18544813)

lol i bet vanster wishes his people had built a wall and vetted incoming migrants more often, right?

Dangerdoggie 03-23-2016 01:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoMo (Post 18544847)
Trump gonna win AZ easily. I thought it would be closer but it's already called and pretty sure people are still voting.

70,195 votes for little marco

people are so ****ing stupid

JoMo 03-23-2016 01:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dangerdoggie (Post 18544871)
70,195 votes for little marco

people are so ****ing stupid

It was early voting.

JoMo 03-23-2016 01:41

Seriously some GOP consultants are retarded.

"Ted Cruz will grab an upset win over Donald Trump in Arizona's presidential primary election on Tuesday, as he's the "only candidate with any kind of organization out here," a close confidant of Sen. John McCain predicts.

"They have him positioned to spring the upset," Kurt Davis, a GOP operative in Arizona, told The Hill. "They just have to deliver."
-----

Called for Trump, currently showing:

46% Trump
23% Cruz

Dangerdoggie 03-23-2016 02:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoMo (Post 18544875)
It was early voting.

that many early voters? seems odd.

hopefully McCain has a surprise waiting for him come November.

StapleMammal1 03-23-2016 07:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hellsfury (Post 18543744)
It's amusing how undemocratic people are being in their vain attempt at getting people to respect their rights.

You don't exercise your democratic rights by restricting another persons access to their democratic right. That just shows how little you know about how a democracy actually works.

Everyone gets a voice and then the people vote on which voice should represent the people as a whole.

If you don't like what Trump voice represents, then don't vote for him. You don't get to muffle him and take away his voice just because you don't like the sound of it. That's undemocratic.

Democracy never works because democracy is just a fancy name for mob rule. Which is why the founders of our great nation intended the USA to be what it is supposed to be.

A Republic.

Sent from my Samsung S6 Active using Tapatalk

MC Hamster 03-23-2016 07:59

Wow, whole lotta butthurt in here about my comments. Look, all I'm saying is that _if_ you ascribe to 'party politics'.. to the concept that "I'm a <insert party name here>" is a rational thing for someone to actually say, then you have to acknowledge that those labels do actually mean something. The core of the Republican party doesn't seem to want Trump representing them. Presumably, they don't see him as reflecting what they stand for.

Well.. if they have the numbers there to keep him out, then that's that. If not, he'll take it. IF they keep him out, he's free to go off and stand as an independent as he's threatened, or even go and make his own party and take his supporters with him on the way. That'll form another 'conservative' party which the Repubs can side with or against as fits their own goals.

I'm not trying to say it's a good or bad thing, it's just how modern politics works. Personally, I hate the **** and I think your system is even more dominated by it (the partisan ****, that is) than our own, so if The Donald does nothing more than weaken that system with his candidacy, that's a good thing in my book. I also think he'd be a pretty lousy President, but damn it'd be fun to watch.

Reggs 03-23-2016 08:09

Good article. Trump is the kind of president we need right now and recently current events keep on proving him to be correct in retrospect when everyone else was wrong.

JoMo 03-23-2016 08:20

Establishment going all in on Ted Cruz, lol

Jeb endorsed, Club for Growth Endorsed, Rove endorsed.

absent 03-23-2016 08:42

British Muslims aren't reporting terror suspects

Cultural marxist triggering intensifies.

KingSobieski 03-23-2016 10:03

All the losers are endorsing Cruz

Trump said so.

Tyco 03-23-2016 10:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by MC Hamster (Post 18544434)
So a party should just endorse anyone who's popular enough to win them the election and wants to be considered their representative? Even if he doesn't actually represent their values?

Honestly, not picking that guy is actually showing a bit of backbone, standing up for the principles of the party even at its own expense. That's actually kinda admirable. That's saying "We know this guy is popular, and we know we could win with him.. but doing so would be sacrificing what we stand for, and we'd rather take the risk on losing the election than doing that."

As much as I despise party politics, I find it vaguely noble that those 'in the biz' can actually show some principle when it comes down to it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MC Hamster (Post 18544435)
As someone who is part of that world stage: No. Bush was an embarassment for you guys. Trump is an embarassment for you guys. Obama is actually someone most of us out here kinda like.

Don't just take my word for it though, here's a Pew Research page asking the question all over:

http://www.pewglobal.org/database/in...r/6/survey/17/

Compare the Obama years to the Bush years. It's day and night.

The irony of these 2 comments being posted together is not realizing that Bush represents the principles of the Republican establishment. Therefore, the "core" of the Republican party is an embarrassment for the US. Hopefully now you see why such a large segment of registered Republican voters disagree with the party's current leadership. People aren't voting for Trump; they are voting against the establishment. If you look at the Democratic side, the establishment choice is given an absurd 500 delegate head start in the primary.

You are a right, though, in that Obama was a fine president; but it seems as if average Joes like you and LouCypher do not understand why. Obama was a fine president because of his ability to compromise, not just between the Left and Right, but also between the establishment and anti-establishment. Most notably, see the Iran Nuclear Deal. He did not bend over to AIPAC (i.e. establishment) and order the bombing of Iran.

JoMo 03-23-2016 10:50

Iran nuclear deal is terrible though, so that's a poor 'accomplishment'.

If anything, Obama gets props for not being George W Bush, and not going to war when he was pressured to overthrow Assad.

Other than that, he's really been a big nothing.

KingSobieski 03-23-2016 11:03

Obama was READY to go to war with Assad.

Putin slapped him like a little girl.

JoMo 03-23-2016 11:24

Trump's wife was used in an ad by a SuperPAC that supports Ted Cruz. I'm not sure if it helped or hurt him.

http://gq-images.condecdn.net/image/...dKJPN/crop/810

[N]PRIME189 03-23-2016 11:41

Trump responded on Twitter he would spill some beans about Ted's wife if he isn't careful lol

MadHatSam 03-23-2016 11:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoMo (Post 18544995)
Iran nuclear deal is terrible though, so that's a poor 'accomplishment'.

If anything, Obama gets props for not being George W Bush, and not going to war when he was pressured to overthrow Assad.

Other than that, he's really been a big nothing.

Why do you think the deal is terrible?

If Iran develops a nuclear weapon in the next 10 years it obviously will be a failure but that was a risk without a deal too.

KingSobieski 03-23-2016 11:44

That blanket looks soft.

JoMo 03-23-2016 12:53

LOL Now that Jeb has endorsed Ted!

http://www.tedbush.org/

Veniggs 03-23-2016 12:57

i don't get why the iran deal was bad

because israel doesn't like it? because it makes you feel like a *****?

havax 03-23-2016 12:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoMo (Post 18545049)
LOL Now that Jeb has endorsed Ted!

http://www.tedbush.org/

http://nebula.wsimg.com/dcecf34bbffb...&alloworigin=1

wow, that is really dumb

site obviously made by retard bernie supporter

JoMo 03-23-2016 13:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by MadHatSam (Post 18545018)
Why do you think the deal is terrible?

If Iran develops a nuclear weapon in the next 10 years it obviously will be a failure but that was a risk without a deal too.

Links to reasons why the Iran deal is a bad deal.

http://www.majorityleader.gov/2015/0...deal-bad-deal/

MadHatSam 03-23-2016 13:48

Only 9 and 13 are actual reasons for concern and would be exacerbated without any deal in the first place, the rest are empty or flat out idiotic talking points.

So you have no real reason other than some people oppose it and say it is a bad idea on purely subjective ideological reasons without any objective support for those issues currently.

The deal isn't perfect, but no deal ever is. Just because GW lumped Iran and N. Korea together doesn't mean they are at all equal.

Long term Iran even might be a better partner for peace and stability in the region than the Saudi's or Israel.

Kerosene31 03-23-2016 13:54

Also people forget that the moment Iran comes close to building anything that would so much as make a loud bang, Israel will bomb the **** out of them.

Plus how has toppling stable but ****ty regimes worked over there so far?

MC Hamster 03-23-2016 15:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyco (Post 18544993)
The irony of these 2 comments being posted together is not realizing that Bush represents the principles of the Republican establishment. Therefore, the "core" of the Republican party is an embarrassment for the US. Hopefully now you see why such a large segment of registered Republican voters disagree with the party's current leadership. People aren't voting for Trump; they are voting against the establishment. If you look at the Democratic side, the establishment choice is given an absurd 500 delegate head start in the primary.

I fully understand Bush is something of a beacon of Republicanism.

Trump seems more a Tea Party kinda guy, which (correct me if I'm wrong) is something of.. well, almost a splinter facton within the party. Presumably if that 'core' of the party has the numbers and the power to block him, then that faction does not represent a real majority within the party. In which case, if I were Trump, I'd go off and make it official and form a new party and take with him those that will come. Sounds like he'd be a significant force for both majors to have to negotiate with.

Quote:

You are a right, though, in that Obama was a fine president; but it seems as if average Joes like you and LouCypher do not understand why. Obama was a fine president because of his ability to compromise, not just between the Left and Right, but also between the establishment and anti-establishment. Most notably, see the Iran Nuclear Deal. He did not bend over to AIPAC (i.e. establishment) and order the bombing of Iran.
Err.. his diplomatic ability is exactly why Obama is (IMO) a pretty damn good President, and Trumps lack thereof is the main reason I personally think he'd be absolutely horrible as one... which is an opinion I've shared before :)

MadHatSam 03-23-2016 15:51

A large portion of the US population wants a big swinging dick in the White House, with little care of the actual policies or actions they might take or the consequences of those actions.

The idea of a US that isn't a unilateral force for change in the world is absolutely terrifying to some people.

WarBuddha 03-23-2016 15:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kerosene31 (Post 18545081)
Also people forget that the moment Iran comes close to building anything that would so much as make a loud bang, Israel will bomb the **** out of them.

Plus how has toppling stable but ****ty regimes worked over there so far?

Eh, Iran is a real wild card. They could make enough money from trade now to buy black market uranium from China and hide the enrichment from the inspectors. Once they get a bomb, they can basically start doing whatever they want in the Middle East.

MasterGnr 03-23-2016 15:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by MadHatSam (Post 18545077)
Long term Iran even might be a better partner for peace and stability in the region than the Saudi's or Israel.

Yep....just like that reset with Russia worked well for everyone. Especially Ukraine.

Just pretend if you treat radical countries nicely they will play nice with everyone else. Obama diplomacy at its finest.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

MadHatSam 03-23-2016 15:56

Except that they already do whatever they want in many ways, and even the hardliners want a more cosmopolitan and civilized middle east compared to what the Saudi's and Jews want for the region.

Developing and maintaining a nuclear arsenal is expensive, sure some crazies still want it, but overall it is in Iran's national interest to use the potential development of one as leverage which is cheaper and more effective than actually developing one.

KingSobieski 03-23-2016 15:58

Who cares what Iran does, the Bush family was the first to support Iran wholeheartedly when they deposed Saddam and replaced him with an Iran-friendly Shiite president.

Iran + Iraq + Syria are BFF's.

Bush is the real Neville Chamberlain appeasing Iran.

Now is the perfect time for ISIS to come out of the dark and form a new Caliphate.

Obama is trying to midwife the little bastard baby that George Bush conceived while ****ing up the balance of power.


Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:35.
Page 25 of 626

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2003, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Content Copyright 1999-2020 Tribalwar.Com, LLC