Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
TribalWar Forums
Page 26 of 126

TribalWar Forums (https://www.tribalwar.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Discussion (https://www.tribalwar.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Las Vegas/Mandalay Bay mass shooting (https://www.tribalwar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=689005)

Fool 10-02-2017 18:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Tele (Post 18836041)

Anti-fa professor who tweeted 'dead cops' used fetish site | Daily Mail Online

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/...6828936921.jpg

Captain Tele 10-02-2017 18:20

hahahhaha

**** eating cucks make so many demands

not just with wrenches when sucker punching anymore

hitting a nazi simply isn't good enough anymore for them

Data 10-02-2017 18:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Tele (Post 18836057)
half the people in this thread have so many "great ideas" of how to fix this issue

but do not even know that "automatics" are already illegal and highly restricted

the difference between auto and semi auto

and pretty much the process to own or operate any gun

so pretty much we have a bunch of these people with more opinions

Rep. Diana DeGette appears not to understand how guns work

we might as well listen to them talk about how to stop guam from flipping over

whenever i ask where the **** do these idiots come from........i need to remember they have constituents and they vote (just like posters in here)

Guns are fairly complicated machines and it's no surprise that lawmakers are jumping at the chance to make new rules about them without even trying to understand them OR THE EXISTING LAWS first. They do this **** all the time. Name a subject. Somebody, somewhere has probably tried to enact a grossly incompetent law about it. The media doesn't help either... :rolleyes:

Captain Tele 10-02-2017 18:25

what if we got rid of the big guns

how about the scary guns

how about the guns that shoot too many bullets

hold too many bulllets

how about the semi autos?

why does anyone need to hunt in a modern society?

why does anyone need to protect anything when everything is free?

Assembly Bill 7: long gun ban in incorporated counties awaits Gov. Jerry Browns signature or veto | The Sacramento Bee

i wonder how we got here.......i really do

sadly i already know where this goes next (study south america)

Data 10-02-2017 18:26

Sorry your state is so ****ed, bro. :(

Paladin-5 10-02-2017 18:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Data (Post 18836058)
Who the **** are you?

Instead of commenting at me like a ****ing spectator, how about engage me with a defensible opinion? Do you know how forums work, or are you just a limp-dicked ******?

Ok, kid porn anime dude. Unlike you I'm not hyper defensive at the idea that maybe there could be some improvements in gun control.
But you keep railing about how you're gonna need that suppressor when it's time to 'rise up' again the gov.

Captain Tele 10-02-2017 18:27

when we ban guns we will be good again

as prosperous as the rest of mexico we will soon rejoin

Captain Tele 10-02-2017 18:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paladin-5 (Post 18836074)
Ok, kid porn anime dude.

this passes for an argument......a rebuttal

this walking commie cuck pos sees no need for you to have guns

end of story

LMAO

:srsly:

get the helicopter ready......we have another drop off

amRam 10-02-2017 18:27

Again just look at Canada for nonsense gun regulation steeped in ignorance.

AK-47 prohibited entirely

AR-15 restricted only to range use

Tavor or xcr, non-restricted do whatever you want with it

****ing idiots. The whole lot of them.

cael 10-02-2017 18:28

won't somebody please think of the rednecks in canada who can't have their toys

Ztir 10-02-2017 18:29

How often are violent crimes in Canada commited with ak47s and ar15s

Edofnor 10-02-2017 18:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Data (Post 18836073)
Sorry your state is so ****ed, bro. :(

it is so sad they nuked paradise :(

idk wat we were expecting w/ the world's biggest baby boomer magnet tho

Captain Tele 10-02-2017 18:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by cael (Post 18836078)
won't somebody please think of the rednecks in canada who can't have their toys

i just wish more people were honest with their intentions

what they really want to say is **** you......you aren't a person

you shouldn't be able to defend yourself or your property

and we will continue to tell you what to do with all of it

especially the good parts we want to redistribute and take for our greater good

just look at south america and all of africa (next to be Europe) for how well this will work out historically

or just go back to China during any period in last several centuries

oh well.......tw doesn't make law we just laugh at them

Osiris 10-02-2017 18:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Data (Post 18836054)
OK, sure.

I reject your concept of gun control. More laws fix nothing.

1. Enforce the laws already on the books. There are thousands of them and enforcement is a ****ing joke. Start there. I'm sure a few of them will even have a measurable impact on crime.

2. Repeal the ones that don't make sense. There are thousands of them and they are ****ing stupid. Start with the NFA, GCA, and FOPA. Keep the bits that DO make sense if you must (see, I can be reasonable!).

3. Abolish so called "gun free zones". They are a failed idea that assumes people with violent criminal intent will see a sign and give up.

There's 3 easy things we can start doing now that don't require a bunch of new legislation. The POTUS has in his power to order the DOJ to aggressively prosecute existing gun laws, and Congress can get to work on repealing/ammending the rest.

There are more guns in this country than there are people. WE KNOW ABOUT roughly 300 million of them. Those are only the ones we know about. And we have the manufacturing capacity to produce many more. The United States will always be an armed country. There's no escaping it. You're not going to wake up one day and all the guns are magically gone along with all the knowledge and capability to create them. The cat is already out of the bag. Knowing that, it makes the most sense to encourage those most willing and able to arm themselves in their own (and in the collective) defense.

That post was directed at tele because hes about to bomb this thread like the maga thread.

Im not advocating a ban on firearms and i never did. I advocate much stricter control and its mainly your last paragraph i disagree the the most with.

If you have stricter control the number of guns will decrease over the years. (The exisiting ones ultimately get worn out/break/straight up get tossed in the lake or lost in the woods for that matter) and if you then restrict the amount going out on the market; of course overall number of guns will decrease over time.

Like i argued in a previous wall of text in this thread: strict control is the only solution. It would probably take decades if not a century or two before it was the 'new' normal but it would work. I mean if were not dead from nuclear winter by then. I understand its a bitter pill to swallow but the reasons given for needing to have liberal gun laws dont hold up in a western country in the 21st century.

cael 10-02-2017 18:32

i hear there's tons of home defense weapons in africa, that's why the region is so stable and such a pleasant place to live

Captain Tele 10-02-2017 18:32

if only we had posting laws and speed limits this thread could be reasonable again

says guy who doesn't know what semi automatic means......but really wants to ban them

amRam 10-02-2017 18:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ztir (Post 18836079)
How often are violent crimes in Canada commited with ak47s and ar15s

Basically as often as they are in the us. Very, very rarely.

Captain Tele 10-02-2017 18:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by cael (Post 18836084)
i hear there's tons of home defense weapons in africa, that's why the region is so stable and such a pleasant place to live

i don't see why anyone needs a semi automatic Osiris says

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DKvBx-MVYAAcg7J.jpg:large

LMAO

come visit any major american city if you still don't understand (where the guns, not the nogs, are likely banned)

Data 10-02-2017 18:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paladin-5 (Post 18836074)
Ok, kid porn anime dude. Unlike you I'm not hyper defensive at the idea that maybe there could be some improvements in gun control.
But you keep railing about how you're gonna need that suppressor when it's time to 'rise up' again the gov.

When did I say that? Can you direct me to a specific post?

No, you can't. Of course not. If you'd bothered to read anything I actually said you'd know that I made the opposite point earlier, when I stated:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Data (Post 18835996)
[T]he most obvious truth about all this: actual armed revolt isn't even necessary, and it's not the main purpose of the 2A. Merely the potential of armed resistance is enough, in most cases, to keep tyranny at bay. If the basest motive of government is to continuously amass power over the people, then tyranny is inevitable unless the people retain the ultimate reset button: revolution. The existence of an armed, trained, and willing populace is very effective (if imperfect) at moderating government's power.

And if you're having trouble understanding what I said here, I can break it down for you:

The threat of armed revolt is sufficient to keep government in check. It makes actual armed conflict unnecessary... for the most part.

You're way out of your league. Get the **** out of here.

Edofnor 10-02-2017 18:35

we need a compromise

cael brings up a good point that helps us make one:

melanin-enhanced americans cannot own guns

job done thank u good night


Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:13.
Page 26 of 126

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2003, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Content Copyright 1999-2020 Tribalwar.Com, LLC