Those as in "all." Reading is fundamental.So by "THOSE buildings were designed to get hit" you meant WTC7?
you're fucking retarded.
Retard.
Those as in "all." Reading is fundamental.So by "THOSE buildings were designed to get hit" you meant WTC7?
you're fucking retarded.
Pretending that I'm too smart? Give me a fucking break. You people are so fucking pathetically insecure. Someone laughs at a statement you make and suddenly they think they're too smart to give any legit points!1
Those buildings were designed to take airliner impact. Yes, you fucking morons, a passenger jet flying into them as a means of attacking the building. Do you know what that means? Do you think that when they were designing them, they didn't factor in the fuel? Or the heat incurred to the support beams by jet fuel burning in closed quarters? Those stupid structural engineers!
Ignorance is astounding. What's even more amazing is your faith in what people tell you. Even if anyone in this thread was right on any matter discussed, it's not because of your personal knowledge or insight, it's because you, like everyone else is following what someone else said. NIST said so, so it must be 100% true!1
hk how could you be so clueless AND be an astrophysicist at the same timeval how could you be so clueless AND be an engineer at the same time
Those buildings were designed to take airliner impact. Yes, you fucking morons, a passenger jet flying into them as a means of attacking the building. Do you know what that means? Do you think that when they were designing them, they didn't factor in the fuel? Or the heat incurred to the support beams by jet fuel burning in closed quarters? Those stupid structural engineers!
No, no, no, WC7 didn't get hit, remember. Debris caused a fire and it burned down.
Those as in "all." Reading is fundamental.
You're not supposed to have blind faith for anything, you fucking retard.So we are supposed to have blind faith in the structural engineers that built the buildings, but completely ignore the structural engineers investigating the collapse.
Jesus fuck you are dumb.
Who gives a shit about the towers? Besides, what? Do you have a structural engineering degree? Who the fuck told you how much "energy" the buildings could take from a jet? And who said that fire-fighters would be able to control a fire that was fueled by jet fuel?Furthermore, the planes that hit the WTC had an impact energy 10 times what the design called for, and their wingspan was 26 feet meaning it impacted more columns. Furthermore, it was assumed that should a plane it, it would be low on fuel and firefighters would be able to contain the fire.
You're not supposed to have blind faith for anything, you fucking retard.
Yea, is right. Those buildings were designed in very specific ways (aka, airliner impact). WTC7 didn't get hit by a jet, it burned down.
Who gives a shit about the towers? Besides, what? Do you have a structural engineering degree? Who the fuck told you how much "energy" the buildings could take from a jet? And who said that fire-fighters would be able to control a fire that was fueled by jet fuel?
Yes, because your close brother is an independent structural engineer that specializes in collapsed buildings. He was there after it collapsed and personally told you his opinion. Right?except for youtube videos. comeon guys, try to keep up!
Yea, is right. Those buildings were designed in very specific ways (aka, airliner impact). WTC7 didn't get hit by a jet, it burned down.
Reading is fundamental.
Brilliant analogies.yeah totally.
also, are you an astronaut? I definitely am not. How the fuck am I supposed to believe the earth is round? I've never seen it. And I certainly am not a physicist. How the hell am I supposed to believe in "gravity"? I dont trust all of those government funded "scientists" who report these "facts" to us.
If it was designed for airliner impact, why was the design so radically different from the design of at least one skyscraper that has actually been struck by an airplane?Yea, is right. Those buildings were designed in very specific ways (aka, airliner impact). WTC7 didn't get hit by a jet, it burned down.
Reading is fundamental.
K.And as I said before, maybe the engineers made a mistake trying to design for something that has never happeend before! (regarding WTC1/2)
Yea, you're right, no fires or structural damage has ever occurred in the past that could've prepared the engineers properly...And maybe a fire and lots of structural damage caused a building to collapse! (wtc7)
Brilliant analogies.
You should go make some more regarding Gaza and Israel.
I could easily lie one way or the other. It's not like anyone is going to prove anything on either side.
You're all full of shit, just like me. And I take great pleasure in exploiting it. None of you have engineering degrees, let alone structural engineering, and yet you all claim to be experts because you watched a video about 9-11 truthers or debunkers. You're all hypocritical morons. None of you, including me, knows jack shit about what happened.
It has happened in the past, and yet the design was fundamentally different.K.
Yea, you're right, no fires or structural damage has ever occurred in the past that could've prepared the engineers properly...
K.
Yea, you're right, no fires or structural damage has ever occurred in the past that could've prepared the engineers properly...
Let's ask one of the twenty structural engineering doctors in here. They watched YouTube videos of smoke and a collapsing video. What more knowledge do you need?!If it was designed for airliner impact, why was the design so radically different from the design of at least one skyscraper that has actually been struck by an airplane?
There's no mystery.he mystery deepens.