Xapz
04122011, 10:48 PM
Ill give you a hint how num ( num ) translates
I'll tell you how num num translates.
num num = 1 less cookie
I'll tell you how num num translates.
num num = 1 less cookie
48÷2(9+3) =Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
[30]
31
32
33
34
35
Xapz 04122011, 10:48 PM Ill give you a hint how num ( num ) translates I'll tell you how num num translates. num num = 1 less cookie Whimsical 04122011, 11:01 PM The question is all about the Obelus (÷) and what it is representing in the equation. Now my brain is telling me its separating the equation like so: 48  the dividend, numerator, the top dot above the vinculum in the Obelus Symbol Obelus (÷)  vinculum, fraction line, the line yo 2(9+3)  the divisor, denominator, the bottom dot Thus my brain sees it as i said before: http://i891.photobucket.com/albums/ac119/lubos15/yes.jpg Pagy 04122011, 11:02 PM The question is all about the Obelus (÷) and what it is representing in the equation. Now my brain is telling me its separating the equation like so: 48  the dividend, numerator, the top dot above the vinculum in the Obelus Symbol Obelus (÷)  vinculum, fraction line, the line yo 2(9+3)  the divisor, denominator, the bottom dot Thus my brain sees it as i said before: http://i891.photobucket.com/albums/ac119/lubos15/yes.jpgwell your brain doesn't obey the order of operations Whimsical 04122011, 11:12 PM Never said i was a Mathemagician :) Code4 04122011, 11:13 PM I'll tell you how num num translates. num num = 1 less cookie finally something we can all agree on in this thread Witch 04132011, 03:04 AM I think it's pretty stupid to call people who answered 2 dumb. It's easy to misread the equation when it's written like that. If you'd present it like this: http://tinyurl.com/6542acb it would be clear to everyone. Obibun 04132011, 03:07 AM holy **** how is this still like the most popular thread on tribalwar HEY NERD ****S START THREADS ABOUT WOMEN OR EXPLOSIONS OR MUSCLE CARS OR GUNS OR SOMETHING YOU'RE MAKING THE FORUM LOOK BAD aNimAL 04132011, 03:10 AM lmfaaooooo good nig ht Dangerdoggie 04132011, 03:48 AM holy **** how is this still like the most popular thread on tribalwar HEY NERD ****S START THREADS ABOUT WOMEN OR EXPLOSIONS OR MUSCLE CARS OR GUNS OR SOMETHING YOU'RE MAKING THE FORUM LOOK BAD Did you get your butt plug printer setup yet? give us an update when you start production. SkittleBrew 04132011, 05:47 AM what you mean and what you type are completely different. What you just typed could technically be simplified to y/x. now if you wrote it on paper and the y was clearly under the "/" then it would be 1/(xy). but if something is in type that is to be directly transmitted to a calculator, 1/xy would be the same as 1 ÷ x * y amen SkittleBrew 04132011, 06:00 AM Implicit Multiplication. It's a rule. It's not open to interpretation. You're ****ing stupid. You're wrong. On implied multiplication (http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/54341.html) Some texts make a rule, as in your second solution, that multiplication without a symbol ("implied multiplication") should be done before any other operations in an expression, including "explicit multiplication" using a symbol. Following this rule, you would multiply a by x, then multiply b and y, then divide one by the other. Some (probably most) texts don't mention such a rule  but some of those may use it without saying so, which is far worse. I don't know of a general rule among mathematicians that implied multiplication should be done before explicit multiplication. As far as I'm concerned, all multiplications fit in the same place in the order of operations. It's not an unreasonable rule, though, since it does seem that implied multiplication ties the operands together more tightly, at least visually; but the idea of Order of Operations (or precedence, as it is called in the computer world) is supposed to be to ensure that everyone will interpret an otherwise ambiguous expression the same way  so if some texts change the rules, or if people do what feels natural, the purpose has been lost. SkittleBrew 04132011, 06:12 AM Can you help me script my letter to Casio to address their bad programming, all I have so far is: Dear complete idiots, I couldn't help noticing your complete inability to understand SIMPLE ORDER OF OPERATIONS. wtfffffffffffffff Implied Multiplication Versus Explicit Multiplication on TI Graphing Calculators.  Knowledge Base by Texas Instruments  US and Canada (http://epsstore.ti.com/OA_HTML/csksxvm.jsp?nSetId=103110 ) Does implied multiplication and explicit multiplication have the same precedence on TI graphing calculators? Implied multiplication has a higher priority than explicit multiplication to allow users to enter expressions, in the same manner as they would be written. For example, the TI80, TI81, TI82, and TI85 evaluate 1/2X as 1/(2*X), while other products may evaluate the same expression as 1/2*X from left to right. Without this feature, it would be necessary to group 2X in parentheses This order of precedence was changed for the TI83 family, TI84 Plus family, TI89 family, TI92 Plus, Voyage***8482; 200 and the TINspire***8482; Handheld in TI84 Plus Mode. Implied and explicit multiplication is given the same priority. ****ing PWNED *****! Horatio Balderdash 04132011, 07:22 AM This thread is great, let's see how I can extend it in some small way... The venerable 'bc' gets around the problem of implicit multiplication by not allowing it, or faggy divideby symbols, for that matter. > bc bc 1.06.94 Copyright 19911994, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2004, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. For details type `warranty'. 48÷2(9+3) (standard_in) 1: illegal character: \367 (standard_in) 1: syntax error 48/2*(9+3) 288 Bounty 04132011, 08:13 PM You guys keep arguing about this ****, I'm going to go **** your sisters. And by "sisters," I obviously mean "brothers." Jim Beam 04132011, 08:50 PM Implied Multiplication Versus Explicit Multiplication on TI Graphing Calculators.  Knowledge Base by Texas Instruments  US and Canada (http://epsstore.ti.com/OA_HTML/csksxvm.jsp?nSetId=103110 ) ****ing PWNED *****! Nice. 2 Odio 04132011, 08:53 PM 30 pages, when the obvious answer is two. bobett 04132011, 08:57 PM 30 pages, when the obvious answer is fortytwo. Glytch 04132011, 08:57 PM I'd like to point out that only one engineer I work with said 288, and he was from USA. Every other CS/Eng said 2. 100% from Canada, Russia, Bulgaria, China and Brazil. Either way it's an ambigious question. But it's funny that American's were taught that 10 / 2x = 10 / 2 * x We see that as 10 / (2x). why is it funny to not make assumptions and read the equation as written...? You're are changing the equation. For example, the TI80, TI81, TI82, and TI85 evaluate 1/2X as 1/(2*X), while other products may evaluate the same expression as 1/2*X from left to right. Without this feature, it would be necessary to group 2X in parentheses, something that is typically not done when writing the expression on paper. Eat it ******. Who the **** writes 1/(2*x)? You are a newb at math. Welcome to edumacation Data 04132011, 09:01 PM As of this post, 285 retards and 252 smart people have responded to the poll. Bounty 04132011, 09:02 PM Math is for ****ing ******s who fail at developing decent social skills. Now get out of my cave of isolation before I eat you. 
