Why your cardio should be 60-90 minutes in length

Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5

ptavv
07-30-2007, 02:00 PM
A bunch of the data that I post in this thread will be copy and pasted from other threads (where it was quoted from various books and physiology articles that I've read). It's also nothing that an adroit reader couldn't synthesize from what I've posted in the past, but it seems that unless I spell something out explicity (and even in spite of that) posters on this forum prefer to believe a bunch of ham headed fad diet ideas. Anyway, onward.

Here's a breakdown of when, and at what level, your muscles are engaging in particular types of respiration:

< 65% max HR gets you a 30-70 split between burning carbs/fat
65-85% max HR gets you a 50-50 split
85-88% max HR gets you a 60-40 split (carbs/fat)
88-95% max HR gets you a 70-30 split (carbs/fat)
90-100% max HR gets you an 80-20 split (carbs/fat)
> 100% max HR gets you a >90-<10 split (carbs/fat)

As I outlined here: http://www.tribalwar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=498746

It's important to not consider lower intensity workouts to be "better" for losing weight just because they tend to burn more fat. Absolute values are the important thing here, not the relative values of which fuel source is used. Burning more calories will always help you. That said, there is an optimal range in terms of increasing cardiovascular health (although it won't really improve your VO2max or respirtory capacity [you need HIIT for that by and large]). It's typically somewhere between 65 and 88% of your maximum heart rate. The upper end of this will be more beneficial than the bottom, but if it's not exercise you can sustain for at least an hour, then you should lower your intensity (that sentence only applies if weight loss is your goal! -- if you are training and looking to improve muscle endurance, respiratory capacity, or cardio capacity you should exercise at the maximal intensity you can sustain for any non-trivial period of time).

Okay, sorry that paragraph was so long, here's the layman's science explanation for why what I said above is the case.

As I've explained about a million times, the glycogen (carbohydrates) that your muscles use when you begin working out is stored in and around your muscles. This is called intramusclar glycogen. The other primary source of glycogen your body has is a reserve that's stored in the liver. Your central nervous system (CNS) requires glycogen to function, it can't burn fat, and your liver can't convert protein to glycogen fast enough to supply it (when exercising, at a resting metabolism it usually can), so your liver stores a bunch of glycogen.

When you begin working out your body will begin devouring the glycogen that's stored in your muscles. At around 70% max HR intensity, your body has between 60 and 90 minutes worth of fuel here. At the beginning of your workout, as the fatty acids that are floating around in your blood stream normally start to get depeleted, along with the glycogen in your muscles, your body sends you a signal that says, "RELEASE MORE FUEL."

When this happens there are two seperate processes that occur, your liver will begin to secrete more glucose into your blood stream to carry to the muscles. Your body will also begin to break down fatty deposits in order to get more fatty acids into the blood for your muscles to use. The longer you work out, the more your body will rely on the fatty acids that are getting released to fuel part of the workout. This is because, as muscle glycogen stores deplete, and your liver continues excreting glycogen, it'll hit a limit. Your liver is going to basically say, "You know, I can keep giving up this glycogen, but then his brain isn't going to have any fuel, so I'm just going to tell his muscles to get fucked and they can figure out another way to make the muscles work."

When this happens your body will mobilize even more fat, your maximal intensity will drop, and you'll experience "BONKING." Bonking sucks, you get a head ache, you get dizzy, you feel nauseous, in short, it sucks. The desire to avoid bonking is precisely why triathletes, marathoners, cyclists, all endurance athletes ingest tons of carbohydrates while exercising.

Bonking isn't going to help you lose weight, I'm bringing it up so that you can recognize the signs, understand why your body does that, hopefully listen to what it's trying to tell you, and not freak out. It's also important to realize I'm not telling you to work out to the point of bonking every time. Experiencing it is important in understanding your limits, and trying to avoid the experience again.

As your workout progresses (probably around the hour mark) if you're feeling a headache, or any of the other symptoms coming on, you should lessen your intensity. Now that we've burned up most of the glycogen that our body has lying around, we want our body to continue using up fat, until you run out of time for working out, get tired, whatever.

Okay, you're saying to yourself, that makes sense, but couldn't I take a short cut and just get rid of carbs in my diet so that I can skip that first half hour and go straight to burning fat? The short answer is no. The long answer is still no, and I mentioned many of the reasons in this thread: http://www.tribalwar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=498746

Another important reason not mentioned in that thread, is that by doing that you handicap your workout intensity. You simply won't be able to get decent intensities out of your beginning workout (remember the part about absolute caloric burn, rather than relative!!!). The second reason is more straightforward: You're training your body. If you force your body to adapt to having no carbohydrates around (because you won't give it any) and continue to exercise, your body will respond by stockpiling the available fuel it has, and making poor adaptations.

So, in addition to being unable to exercise at a high level, you're forcing your body to get used to needing to store fat, as well as forcing it to tear muscle apart in order to get glycogen for the left over muscles and the CNS.

Plus, by exercising healthily, you get into a good routine, habituate yourself and your body to healthy eating, you don't have to undergo shocks to your system when you "fall off the wagon" or reach your target weight. As well as the fact that you're habituating your body to exercising in a healthy and conducive way.

Sure, your weight loss will be less than the dumbass who is eating 55% fats, 35% protein, and 10% carbs for the first month, maybe even two or three. Two years down the road, he'll probably still be fat, and you'll be healthy.

Darkstrand
07-30-2007, 02:15 PM
sources for splits?

ptavv
07-30-2007, 02:17 PM
Various books and other sources that all have the same chart... I'll look up what they cited when I get home if you're really that doubtful of it, but I just copy and pasted it from another thread I posted it in where I'd transcribed it from one of the books I own (probably Food for Fitness by Chris Carmichael).

Nevearion
07-30-2007, 02:35 PM
The general idea is right but you can't give such exact numbers. Everyone has a different metabolism and one of the things that make certain athletes more successful than others is their ability to metabolize fats at a higher heart rate. It takes a very long time to naturally condition the body to increase VO2 Max and fat metabolism and different people will have widely different numbers.

But yes the healthiest way to lose weight is just be eating a balanced diet with a good amount of carbs and with continuous exercise.

Another benefit is that with that much exercise people will mentally feel better about themselves from hormone release.

ptavv
07-30-2007, 02:38 PM
You clearly either didn't read my post, or you don't know what you're talking about. I explicitly mentioned that you need HIIT to increase VO2max.

Increasing fat metabolism is something that is immensely improved by training at 60-75% intensity (which is what I recommended in the post).

Seriously, if you guys put half as much effort into examining your own fad diets from a scientific point of view as you do into trying to find flaws in my posts, you'd realize that the diets you're using are retarded.

DropSquad
07-30-2007, 02:54 PM
nobody does HIIT for 60-90 minutes.

Doing HIIT for 30 minutes is pretty intense

Gizmo
07-30-2007, 03:21 PM
good read, you should think about maybe collecting all the stuff youve written and put it together or do something with it and post it in the useful resources thread, so that any newcomers to this side of the forum can see it there without searching

Darkstrand
07-30-2007, 03:54 PM
Various books and other sources that all have the same chart... I'll look up what they cited when I get home if you're really that doubtful of it, but I just copy and pasted it from another thread I posted it in where I'd transcribed it from one of the books I own (probably Food for Fitness by Chris Carmichael).

I'd be very interested to read how they come up with those figures.

TeckMan
07-30-2007, 03:54 PM
the biggest question still in my mind related to this topic is pre-workout nutrition.

If my goal is fat loss, will eating carbs 1-2 hours before working out give my body more glycogen and thus be less reliant on fat for energy?

my workouts are much less intense if I don't throw down a banana right before but if it is going to help burn more fat I could cut this out.

Gizmo
07-30-2007, 04:08 PM
the biggest question still in my mind related to this topic is pre-workout nutrition.

If my goal is fat loss, will eating carbs 1-2 hours before working out give my body more glycogen and thus be less reliant on fat for energy?

my workouts are much less intense if I don't throw down a banana right before but if it is going to help burn more fat I could cut this out.

oh god, If i eat a banana right before I workout I feel like throwing up. But usually only if I run/sprint really hard, or do squats.

ptavv
07-30-2007, 04:43 PM
Eating carbs right before you work out isn't really a big deal. Nor is eating protein. Your body is going to mobilize a bunch of glucose to the blood stream anyway once you start exercising, it isn't going to make a huge difference whether there's already a bit there or not.

Gizmo
07-30-2007, 05:52 PM
I was just saying I can't eat a banana before I work out. It makes me feel all nauseous and stuff.

ptavv
07-30-2007, 05:57 PM
I was just saying I can't eat a banana before I work out. It makes me feel all nauseous and stuff.
I was talking to TeckMan. I don't give a fuck about whether you can eat a banana before working out or not.

SL83
07-30-2007, 06:01 PM
What if you don't eat shit for 1-2 hours before a workout. I usually will "BONK" a lot sooner in that case or feel sluggish.

Gizmo
07-30-2007, 06:54 PM
ptavv loves cock. :shrug:

ptavv
07-30-2007, 06:56 PM
Oh, now you editted it back because you realized what a pussy you looked like crying about how I don't care whether you can eat a banana or not and thinking I would post about it.

Solid work.

Gizmo
07-30-2007, 07:01 PM
its funny that youre an insecure piece of shit, and feel the need to lash out at people for no reason, even after they complimented your original post.

I guess youre just angry though that your Kurayami e-stalking and trolling thread failed miserably and that youre an fat ass.

dubs
07-30-2007, 07:16 PM
Shit, that's a long time to be working out...

ptavv
07-30-2007, 07:24 PM
its funny that youre an insecure piece of shit, and feel the need to lash out at people for no reason, even after they complimented your original post.

I guess youre just angry though that your Kurayami e-stalking and trolling thread failed miserably and that youre an fat ass.

I'm an insecure piece of shit who edits my posts after I make them because I get called out for being a self-centered retard who thinks others will care about whether I can eat a banana before I work out or not?

Yeah, you sure got me nailed buddy.

If you really think that shit like that on TW upsets me in real life, I recommend you step away from the computer very slowly and stop taking things so seriously.

ptavv
07-30-2007, 07:25 PM
nobody does HIIT for 60-90 minutes.

Doing HIIT for 30 minutes is pretty intense

I clearly stated that the recommendations in that post had nothing to do with HIIT. Jesus how are you all so fucking dense?