[2142] Offline Stats Tracking

Grief
10-24-2006, 04:37 PM
Couple of offline stats grabbers. They don't seem to be working 100% correctly from what I can see, though.

http://www.2142-stats.com/ is bf2s' stats tracking service.

http://bf2142tracker.com/ You need to register an account for this one.

ZacH
10-25-2006, 03:42 AM
thanks

Dangerdoggie
10-26-2006, 02:49 PM
EA stat page (http://stage.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield/bf2142/)

Okay, now it's working - link fixed.

Santa
10-26-2006, 02:55 PM
bf2142tracker

Maven
10-30-2006, 10:55 AM
tracker is down till ea decides if they are gonna give legal feeds or not

Dangerdoggie
10-31-2006, 01:21 AM
DICE says one thing and EA does another. I remember how right around E3 it was announced that they (EA) planed on having their own external stat system, DICE told the bf2s people not to worry as it wouldn't be as detailed as their setup.

DICE said they were going to insure the ads in the game would blend into the environment/theme of the game. This is a total crock of shit if you’ve seen the stupid Intel ads.

I’ll keep playing till something better comes along and then join the exodus.

you can block the ads though:

http://micolous.id.au/projects/bf2142/

Gumz
11-12-2006, 03:00 AM
EA Put their stats system up

Here's Mine: http://battlefield.ea.com/battlefield/bf2142/PlayerSummary.aspx?Lang=U S&PID=33789679

As for the ads, i have still yet to notice any ads aside from the defaults that were already there, to be honest if you guys notice the ads then your obviously not paying attention to the game.

haniblecter
11-12-2006, 08:22 AM
How do you have 212 hours play time, yet you're only a 2nd lieutenant?


Nvm, no idea how they compute the playtimes, but I got 3 days 18 hours it seems:

http://battlefield.ea.com/battlefield/bf2142/PlayerSummary.aspx?Lang=U S&PID=81247364&SrchName=&Profiles=

EDIT: Nvm, its days.

Gumz
11-12-2006, 01:47 PM
i think its 2 Days, 12 Hours.

48 + 12 = 60.

my Xfire reads 83 hours, but i have left my PC with 2142 open on BFHQ + minimized, so who knows, so 60 definately sounds more accurate.