The more I see, the more I don't believe an aircraft hit the Pentagon.

b-b-b-but all the plane was pulled into the hole and destroyed by the fire!!! including the wings and the engines!!!


all except this one piece that was not burned so that the recognizeable paint would make a fine photo op....uh huh.

you dont read so well do you:

Moreover, since the airliner was full of jet fuel and was flown into thick, reinforced concrete walls at high speed, exploding in a fireball, any pieces of wreckage large enough to be identifiable in after-the-fact photographs taken from a few hundred feet away burned up in the intense fire that followed the crash (just as the planes flown into the World Trade Center towers burned up, and the intensity of their jet-fuel fires caused both towers to collapse).

Small pieces of airplane debris were plainly visible on the Pentagon lawn in other photographs, however, such as the one below:

so what's your theory- that the government rushed in, planted a chunk of destroyed plane on the lawn (while they were putting out the fire) and took a picture? come on.

I'll take by the lack of an answer you neglected to take that into account.

As far as the camera itself being at an angle, you can use the cement at the bottom of the picture as a reference that the angle of the camera relative to the building appears to be between 70 and 80 degrees. Regardless, the aircraft appears to be approaching between 40 and 50 degrees relative to the camera.

I rarely tend to flame people, but fucking Christ JuggerNaught you are completely ignoring the evidence that says how the aircraft hit the pentagon and trying to stir up shit by reciting ridiculous claims of conspiracies without any real evidence to back it up. Dare I say your title certainly fits you, Ignorant in bold red letters certainly says it all.

The plane's energy was dissipated into the friggin ground, and when a plane hits the ground, there is usually not much left. Now, you have a 757 with a full load of fuel hitting the ground at what, 250 mph? The explosion from the fuel disintegrated much of the plane and the rest of the force went into the pentagon. Because the rings were reinforced with Kevlar they absorbed the rest of the force from the plane, which is why the damage only shows on the two outer rings. The fuselage slammed into the rings leaving several holes, and the fuel melted most of the metal.

If you watch the video you'll see what looks like a blanket of fire engulfing the side of the pentagon. This is the plane hitting the ground, the tanks exploding, and the fire spreading into the direction that the plane was heading. If you do a little research you'll see all of the telephone and light poles the plane clipped on the way in, as well as eye witness accounts that saw the plane hit the building.

you dont read so well do you:



so what's your theory- that the government rushed in, planted a chunk of destroyed plane on the lawn (while they were putting out the fire) and took a picture? come on.
by the state of the building in the background...the position of the shadows...i'd say that picture was taken a couple hours later

blah blah blah

The plane's energy was dissipated into the friggin ground, blah blah blah.

no scars on the grass, no burns on the grass, nothing hit the ground.

thanks for playing.

by the state of the building in the background...the position of the shadows...i'd say that picture was taken a couple hours later

so... are you saying that some shadowy government group rushed in, and within a few hours had gone to the trouble of planting airplane debris in the immediate area of the crash? Since the rest of the people were busy putting out the fires, they didnt notice someone hauling in a big chunk of debris and placing it there?

I'm just trying to get your little 'theory' here, since it seems to contradict all logic.

no scars on the grass, no burns on the grass, nothing hit the ground.

thanks for playing.
thats because it crashed into the side of the building not onto the ground then skidded into the wall

b-b-b-but all the plane was pulled into the hole and destroyed by the fire!!! including the wings and the engines!!!


all except this one piece that was not burned so that the recognizeable paint would make a fine photo op....uh huh.


OH MY GOD.

My brain hurts now.

Crash that plane into the Pentagon a hundred times and I bet you get 100 DIFFERENT debris fields and damage to the building. God there are soo many variables involved here its not even funny.

So... did we finally figure it out??? :spineyes:

thats because it crashed into the side of the building not onto the ground then skidded into the wall

so we're back to a cessna trained pilot that his instructors said didnt know shit, bringing a 757 in at 10-15 feet and 503 mph so that the 65 feet deep, 77 foot tall bulding would catch 155 feet of plane, but not disturb the grass

so... are you saying that some shadowy government group rushed in, and within a few hours had gone to the trouble of planting airplane debris in the immediate area of the crash? Since the rest of the people were busy putting out the fires, they didnt notice someone hauling in a big chunk of debris and placing it there?

I'm just trying to get your little 'theory' here, since it seems to contradict all logic.
I'm saying that if you wanted to make it appear that a plane had hit, and needed sizeable, recognizeable debris to do so, in the chaos that would have ensued with firefighters, fbi, etc all around, it could have been done.

This is stupid.

Jugg, have you ever even taken a class in physics?

Because a team of professors from the University of Purdue spent 95 hours analyzing each 10th of a second of the crash using supercomputers designed to analyze this sort of thing.

Do you honestly believe the shit you've read on the internet?

The missle theory brings up many questions

1] How did a missle create a crater in the building when they are designed to explode on impact

2] Who the Hell fired the missle?

3] What the Hell happened to the people on the flight

4] How the Hell did the missle cause all the ground damage on the flight path

5] Why have no Engineering, physicists, or analysits with any sort of stature noticed the "impossibility" of it being a plane, and yet the only people who have claimed this "impossibility" are cook internet scam artists who appeal to the simplistic minds of Folks who don't understand the complexities in a crash of this stature.

How come the only people who write/believe this shit are the people who have no qualifications, knowledge, to make these claims?

That should tell you right off the bat what is the "truth"

hold up z..it COULD have been a missle...OR a small aircraft.

and what exactly does this shadowy government group have to gain by planting evidence and deceiving the general public?

and what exactly does this shadowy government group have to gain by planting evidence and deceiving the general public?

what would a 'shadowy government' gain by the actions that happened because of the attacks?

2] Who the Hell fired the missle?

3] What the Hell happened to the people on the flight

The answer is obvious. The US government fired the missile, in conjunction with the remote controlled airplanes that flew into the towers and the one that crashed into the ground (for realistic purposes). The people on the airplane that "crashed" into the pentagon was sent into the Bermuda triangle and disappeared in a cloud of green ass gas


/sarcasm

Nobody should ever take anybody that thinks you can get aids from a dead guy with aids bleading into drinking water and then drinking said water seriously.

Nobody should ever take anybody that thinks you can get aids from a dead guy with aids bleading into drinking water and then drinking said water seriously.
best you can come up with? you cant actually be involved in the conversation because you cant use your own brain for anything so the best you can do is try to discredit the poster with the point of view your gnat's brain cant process?

gj.

I seriously think juggs is another orbital, it has to be an act, no one is this dumb.

hold up z..it COULD have been a missle...OR a small aircraft.


A missile or a small plane NEVER, I repeat NEVER could have caused that much damage to a building that is MEANT to take damage from missiles, bombs, artillery, plane impacts. God man give it up.

Do you know how thick the outer layer is? Did you know that its insulated with a net that catches debris to keep it from becomming shrapnel that can further damage the building and kill people? Did you know that this building was meant to absorb huge impacts? Do you even realize how much of the building was damaged? Do you know how big the building actually is? It mgith look small in photos but in terms of square footage that is the largest building in the world. Atleast it was back when I was in highschool and I read some books on it.