Another Computer Thread

I know there have been ton of these,

but does anyone have specs close to this?

AMD Barton 2500+
768MB Ram - 333
Gainward GeForce 6800GT
2 80 Gig HD - 8MB cache each

1) Hows your FPS on a full server?
2) How long does it take for you to load up the game?
3) Whats the CPU usage like?
4) Any suggestions, flames?

Thanks for reading
-[nCn]SpidershocK

you will hardly be able to play minesweeper. get a new computer, dumbarse

shaz... :(

Well
1) I know it will be playable. I would like to know though what people are getting with specs around this, so when I try the game I will know if im getting the performance I should be getting.

2600+AMD
1gb ram
gforce4 ti4400

Getting about 50 to 40 fps on avg..details mostly set to high while a few are set to low(shadows, glows)
The game loads for me around 30 seconds or so..
CPU usage i havent a clue..I know this game is eating memory like crazy tho..Other than that pretty smooth.

Soyo Dragon mobo
AMD XP 1800+
786MB DDR266
ATI Radeon 9500 Pro
2 X Maxtor 120GB HDs

On the first day of T:V (beta) I set all my options to ultra high and bumped the screen resolution to 1280X1024 (my fav res). I got between 10-40 FPS on a full server and about 25 FPS average*. I looked at it all and thought OMG IT'S GLOWEY! DUDE IT LOOKS SWEET!

Now I have all of my settings to ultra low, I even put it down to high performance in the ATI Cat 4.8 control pannel. I also moved the res down to 1024X768. Now I get between 20-70 FPS and about 40FPS average*. I double MA people and think OMG YOU GOT OWNED!

*note that average FPS is not the "stat fps" console command's average, but throughout an entire match.

Thanks guys just what I was looking for.

Is it me or am I on crack.... P4 1.6 ghz 384 mb rambus400mhz ddr(800 mhz total) 2 7200 rpm drives in a raid-0, built by ati 9800 pro (128mb 256bit r360 core).... Or do ati's performe better at higher resolutions? I have tested with different drivers(ati's, dna, omega's) all settings to low/off and get 40 - 60 in 800x, 50 - 70 fps at 1024x, and I shazbot you not 40 - 90 fps in 1280x. Granted this is based on avg's and each map is different, but in general terms I think the ati card I have like to perform better at higher resolutions.

Nice. I've read reviews which say that alot of the "higher" end cards do perform better at Higher Resolutions.

edit: fixed sentence.

Really? A Vcard that performs better at a higher res than a lower res?

Where did you read these reviews? I am interested.

It was a review of the various video cards and they changed the start out at lower resolutions, then bumped up the resolutions and they performed better at higher resolutions... cant find the link though :-\

What about a

AMD Athlon 2600+ 1.8ghz
512mb DDR
ATI Radeon 9200 128mb

shouldnt be to bad should it?

:bump:

Seems like you should be okay ive seen people with lower system specs that do fine.

Cool what level of detail do you think i could run at with a good framerate?