So the ACLU apparently supports underage nudist camps..

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/08/10/teen.nudist.camp.ap/index.html

God they are doing such a great service to this country :rolleyes:

ACLU idiots strike again.

Fuck the ACLU. Protecting people's rights? Damn hippies. Rights aren't that important anyways.

Poster of thread,

You're showing a real lack of knowledge on the constitution and proving yourself a moron with you second and third statements. Please kindly move out of the country, because you obviously don't appreciate the freedom our boys are dying to secure in South Korea, South America, Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere. It's people like you, who ignore the rugged individualism this country was founded on, who need to be deported.

Sincerely,
America




p.s. you are stupid

Why does anyone care if someone else is naked anyway?

The definition of pedophilia is completely cultural.

Biology, women can become sexually active by 13 or 14 in most places on earth. At that point, they're fair game for any sexually active male, at least as far as attractions (natural instinct aka environmental evolutionary programming) go. When a society chooses to, it can construe nudity as normal (England, many others) with no increase in sexual deviancy.

So go read up, suck on some science for a bit, and realize that you're pushing for institutionalized morality, which is absolutely retarded and contrary to the intent of the founding fathers of this nation.

Why does anyone care if someone else is naked anyway?

Don't you know that people should grow up to feel total shame about nudity and the human form, and that everyone should be repressed, uptight, and clothed at all times? Jeeeeez.

Don't you know that people should grow up to feel total shame about nudity and the human form, and that everyone should be repressed, uptight, and clothed at all times? Jeeeeez.

As a male, I know that if I see a naked breast, I am thrust into a raging state where all morality disappears and I become an unpredictable agressive predator who cannot be stopped.*


















*until I rape or kill someone

As a male, I know that if I see a naked breast, I am thrust into a raging state where all morality disappears and I become an unpredictable agressive predator who cannot be stopped.*

*until I rape or kill someone

Same here, for sure. And everyone else is the same way - see a tit, go into a spontaneous rage of lustfulness. What we need is a puritan government to tell us how to combat these urges and lustful, sinful ways, and legislate according to its definitive moral and ethical example!

Don't you know that people should grow up to feel total shame about nudity and the human form, and that everyone should be repressed, uptight, and clothed at all times? Jeeeeez.
They should show a bunch of guys with micropenis to make normal guys think they are hung like stallions

They should show a bunch of guys with micropenis to make normal guys think they are hung like stallions

lol.
Don't forget girls with BB tits - gotta think of the women's self esteem too. Er, maybe not.

PJ, I'm sure, will be in shortly to describe how immoral and deviant nudism is, how it is forced upon children by their parents, and how it promotes pedophilia.

well girls are sexually capable of reproduction at age 13-14, in this nation, in this culture, they aren't emotionally and mentally mature enough to handle it until, in some cases their late 20s. in other cases they're capable at age 16 or earlier. however, a person becomes a legal adult at age 18. therefore, they're allowed to make binding decisions in regards to their own welfare at age 18. this includes such things as marriage and/or long term sexual relationships.

but the question isn't "are the girls mature enough to go nude." it's "are the guys mature enough to not have sex with a 12 year old."

in a culture where youth is beauty, and beauty is youth, and where sex is our delicious household taboo, i don't think it's a wise decision to allow underage nudist camps, since they would have to be run by people over the age of consent, and populated by people under the age of consent.

well girls are sexually capable of reproduction at age 13-14, in this nation, in this culture, they aren't emotionally and mentally mature enough to handle it until, in some cases their late 20s. in other cases they're capable at age 16 or earlier. however, a person becomes a legal adult at age 18. therefore, they're allowed to make binding decisions in regards to their own welfare at age 18. this includes such things as marriage and/or long term sexual relationships.

but the question isn't "are the girls mature enough to go nude." it's "are the guys mature enough to not have sex with a 12 year old."

in a culture where youth is beauty, and beauty is youth, and where sex is our delicious household taboo, i don't think it's a wise decision to allow underage nudist camps, since they would have to be run by people over the age of consent, and populated by people under the age of consent.
The obvious solution is just to get rid of age of consent laws and let everyone have sex together in massive orgies

sargonnas is an idiot, ofn :|

btw the legal age for sex here in england is 16 which is lucky because otherwise i'd be locked up for fucking my g/f ;d

coombz is just bragging about having a 16 year old girlfriend.

:P

true!! its the first time i've slept with a 16 year old since i was 16 myself haha

i'm loving it ;>

edit: oh yeah my previous g/f is 26 ~~

I for one, support hot nudist camps, underage or not!

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/08/10/teen.nudist.camp.ap/index.html

God they are doing such a great service to this country :rolleyes:

ACLU idiots strike again.


like it matters... the case got thrown out because the momos at the ACLU forgot to check whether or not the camp will still in existence in Virginia. bloops.

Just because you're morally against something, doesn't mean it should be criminalized.

Abortion is a prime example of this. Many of the people that I know are morally against abortion and would never do it. However, they don't think a woman should be taken to jail, fined, arrested, etc. for having an abortion, therefore, they must side with Democrats if the republican candidate is a strong advocate for criminalizing abortion.

Likewise, you can be morally against a nudist colony, but not necessarily advocate the banishment of minors from them. Personally, I think our attitude towards nudity in general is too strict. Americans need to lighten up when it comes to that stuff.

Just because you're morally against something, doesn't mean it should be criminalized.


You are absolutely right, Dooby.

The title of the thread was a little misleading - my mistake. For those who didn't look at the article, the ACLU had filed a suit against a law that required a parent or legal guardian to accompany each kid, claiming that it violated their privacy. What was the point of that law, you ask? Why, it was created to more better protect the kids from sexual predators.

In my humble opinion, I thought it was extremely stupid and a waste of time for the ACLU to pursue this. This seemed like another case of ACLU going the way of PETA - Admirable intent but absolutely stupid execution.

Unfortunately, with all the things I have seen ACLU bring legal action to (Is there ever a day they aren't suing someone knew??), I have come to feel that ACLU is not a respectable organization. Instead of diligently preserving our rights, the ACLU almost seems filled with special interest people pushing their own agendas. For instance, instead of doing the right thing by pushing for a colorblind program, ACLU promotes Affirmative Action. :sick: Should I not mention that pointless lawsuits like these are defended with our hard-earned tax dollars?

So in closing: whether or not you share my feelings about ACLU, you are wrong to call me stupid. My opinion has a legitimate basis and, as such, are just as valid (if not more valid) than yours.

Sincerely,
America

p.s. I porked Rev's mother last night.