|
|
Kurayami 02-09-2003, 02:25 PM Originally posted by GigaFool
why are you telling me i'm not always right
what does that have to do with the thread
i said the same thing you did to blitz I know you did. I was refering to the "99% rate of failure" comment. That's an awfully broad generalization with little non-anecdotal evidence to back it up, yet it's being presented as truth. Hence, "you aren't always right."
Stealth 02-09-2003, 02:27 PM :lol:
nigafool 02-09-2003, 02:29 PM Originally posted by Kurayami
I know you did. I was refering to the "99% rate of failure" comment. That's an awfully broad generalization with little non-anecdotal evidence to back it up, yet it's being presented as truth. Hence, "you aren't always right."
it's pretty much common knowledge that long distance relationships generally don't work out
if you think i'm actually saying "out of every 200 people trying a LDR, only 2 get a good relationship out of it" then get a grip
sigh
Fancy Cat 02-09-2003, 02:29 PM Originally posted by Stealth
PWNED DUDE, LoL!!!
Originally posted by Kurayami
LMAo HAHAHHA!!!!!!!!1
RoFlAifagfjhg
:lol: :rofl: lOlloLolLLJll lo: :ro:FLS
Soldevi 02-09-2003, 02:30 PM <Tribalbob> NAT mav > fat mav
*** [4M]Mav sets mode: +b *!*@mask-23620.aol.com
*** Tribalbob was kicked by [4M]Mav ([4M]Mav)
Kurayami 02-09-2003, 02:31 PM Originally posted by GigaFool
it's pretty much common knowledge that long distance relationships generally don't work out
if you think i'm actually saying "out of every 200 people trying a LDR, only 2 get a good relationship out of it" then get a grip
sigh Then don't use arbitrary numbers?
nigafool 02-09-2003, 02:33 PM i'll use arbitrary numbers if i damn well please
i don't account for dumbfuck nitpickers when i write my posts
if you can't glean the necessary information then shove a poker in your eye
Kurayami 02-09-2003, 02:35 PM That's not very nice, Lindsay.
piotrr 02-09-2003, 02:37 PM The necessary information is that counting by percentage of successful long-term relationships, personal ads and meeting on the net are in the lead by a shitload and meeting at bars is groveling somewhere down in the vicinity of family reunions as an efficient place to meet a future wife.
Meeting at work and weddings are somewhere in the middle, with work being on top. Of course, there aren't that many people TOTAL who meet on the net, it's just the percentual success rate that's good.
But hey, you go ahead and make up whatever numbers fit better into what you already think you know. That's a great way of building your self-confidence, I hear.
nigafool 02-09-2003, 02:39 PM uh
i don't know if that post is directed at me
but i wasn't talking about people meeting on the internet
i was talking about long distance relationships where both parties REMAIN a long distance away
i think i mentioned that people who meet on the internet can have a lasting relationship, as long as they actually SEE each other often
Kurayami 02-09-2003, 02:43 PM "97% of people that meet at family reunions don't get married."
--Gigafool's book of arbitrary numbers, page 172
"46.2% of inter-racial relationships are doomed to fail."
--Gigafool's book of arbitrary numbers, page 51
"100% of T2 players are gay."
--Gigafool's book of arbitrary numbers, page 4 (verified by independent studies)
nigafool 02-09-2003, 02:43 PM get a life
Kurayami 02-09-2003, 02:43 PM Originally posted by GigaFool
i think i mentioned that people who meet on the internet can have a lasting relationship, as long as they actually SEE each other often So they only need to invest in webcams?
Kurayami 02-09-2003, 02:45 PM Originally posted by GigaFool
get a life Hey, I'm still trying to make my three year post count as high as your one year count. I can't stop until I reach that goal.
piotrr 02-09-2003, 02:46 PM Originally posted by GigaFool
i was talking about long distance relationships where both parties REMAIN a long distance away
Long distance relationships where both parties remain a long distance away aren't really ever relationships. They're more like bookings. Even the definition of an LDR sort of includes the people actually meeting on occasion.
nigafool 02-09-2003, 02:46 PM high aspirations, i see
Kurayami 02-09-2003, 02:48 PM Indeed.
Dresden 02-09-2003, 02:48 PM had the same thing happen to me, truely sux, feel 4 ya
nigafool 02-09-2003, 02:48 PM Originally posted by piotrr
Even the definition of an LDR sort of includes the people actually meeting on occasion.
obviously, but during the length of the LDR, both people live a good distance away, so they don't see each other as often as normal relationships, which hurts the entire thing.
i don't think i've seen a single LDR in my entire life work without one of the people cheating. a few of them were like "well we can cheat on each other but once we live closer we'll be monogamous"
lol
Fancy Cat 02-09-2003, 02:51 PM this thread isnt about you guys
go take pot shots at each others baby testicles somewhere else
|
|