dear lockntross, juggernaught, critter, and onnotangu

I have respect for Juggernaught, Critter, LockNtross and Onnotangu.





...



Oh shit wrong thread. :o

where can i sign

Originally posted by Sojourn


What part of this do you not understand? The conclusion drawn in that report (a single report, mind you) is that "it might be possible" and then they follow through with "it should be looked into further." Neither one of those statements are conclusive, and since it was done in 1985 you would think that in itself would show you just how inconclusive the report is. They've had almost 18 years to further the study and there is nothing out there that even suggests it.

Maybe does not mean Yes. Maybe that's why you're single.

maybe means its 'possible' which is what I said...it was possible

let me refresh your memory...you said 'impossible'

ill help you and n-man (so i dont mispell it again) the same way.

pay attention. i can send this to you later in a .txt file if you need it.

Me

pos·si·ble ( P ) Pronunciation Key (ps-bl)
adj.
Capable of happening, existing, or being true without contradicting proven facts, laws, or circumstances.
Capable of occurring or being done without offense to character, nature, or custom.
Capable of favorable development; potential: a possible site for the new capital.
Of uncertain likelihood.


You (and the dingleberrys)

im·pos·si·ble ( P ) Pronunciation Key (m-ps-bl)
adj.
Incapable of having existence or of occurring.
Not capable of being accomplished: an impossible goal.
Unacceptable; intolerable: impossible behavior.
Extremely difficult to deal with or tolerate: an impossible child; an impossible situation.

hop into the way back machine with jughead and the gang....go back a couple pages, read your comments,
then read this one more time

slow...cause you know invar has to stand on a chair to see his monitor...dont make him fall.


the virus has survived in water at room temperature for over one week (Barre-Sinoussi et al. 1985). As a result, the sharing of water may be an effective mechanism for viral transfer

now you guys sit here for a minute and compare notes on the above post...im going to go take a piss...i'll give you time to mull that over....tell me what ya come up with when i get back

I am truly amazed at the inherent stupidty displayed in the last 2 or 3 pages of this thread.

I'm so very happy that I didn't waste my time reading the other 25 pages.

I'm out, anything more that Juggernaught says at this point is completely inconsequential. And once again, to remind him:

Originally posted by Juggernaught
the large amounts of water would surely dillute a vial full of blood, it might even delute 2 bodies full of blood...but how many times have you seen videos of various middle eastern settings for executions of 10-15 people like its nothing? shit they killed 3000 of our people without batting an eye....18 of their men went to their deaths willingly...do you think they are the only ones that would die for allah?

Originally posted by Juggernaught
1. I never said it was going to happen, i said it was possible.

Posted by juggernaught earlier:
but i'll lay you a small fortune that if i (or your local terrorist) has someone that is in the midst of full blown aids, cut their throat, and pitch the body in the water supply, anyone who drinks it within the next 6-20 hours (not being generous with the time at all)....anyone who has a bad tooth, cut lip, small cut gum, canker (sp) sore, cold sore, is probably fucked.

Originally posted by RNJBOND
Wow, I just read through this entire horrid thread. Please help me now...

AIDS argument = stupid. Please end now.

Critter = Attention Whore
Juggernaut = Guy that used to be cool, but acts like a jerk all the time now.
LockNTross=Some guy I don't know
Onnotangu=A pretty cool guy in my perspective who occasionally says something stupid.

In conclusion, goodbye Critter and Juggernaut.

I don't want to have wasted all my precious time without my stupid comments being noticed.

Originally posted by Juggernaught
*in a deep voice*

I am Juggernaught, my name means I am big. I make fun of other people that know more than I do. When I lose an argument, I run around in circles. When they catch me, I pretend they didn't catch me at all and then I make fun of more people!

I am Juggernaught.

*stomp stomp stomp*


oh look, he just did it again.

Originally posted by invar


oh look, he just did it again.

lol...i bet you were poking out your chest when you were writing that werent you

Originally posted by Juggernaught
I also like ignoring counterarguments that people make that completely negate my points, much like in that other thread where invar quoted me many times and I ignored all of it to post a seemingly witty insult.


night buddy :wave:

Originally posted by invar
I just got shown the information from 2 different sources including one full report, and I still cant say i'm wrong

night buddy :wave:

:wave:


(i'm not your buddy)

This thread is now about fecal matter:

http://www.animaladvocates.com/images/PROPOSAL%20TO%20BAN%20CHA NING/Vanc,%20old%20shepherd%20 and%20feces.jpg

------------------------------------------------------------

Conclusion

Only continued and extensive virological testing can determine if the sharing of water and other injecting items provides HS' with probable routes for transmission. In the future, researchers may find that our concern with the minute amounts of virus present in shared water containers, spoon and cottons was an overreaction and that the virus is simply not that virulent.

Originally posted by NolMan
Do you even know what a conclusion is? That conclusion was from that very same study that you say proves it.

Clearly it is you that need help with big words like conclusion.

con·clu·sion ( P ) Pronunciation Key (kn-klzhn)
n.
1. The close or last part; the end or finish.
2. The result or outcome of an act or process.
3. A judgment or decision reached after deliberation. See Synonyms at decision.
4. A final arrangement or settlement, as of a treaty.
5. Abbr. con. Law. The close of a plea or deed.
6. Logic.
-a- The proposition that must follow from the major and minor premises in a syllogism.
-b- The proposition concluded from one or more premises; a deduction.


vir·u·lent ( P ) Pronunciation Key (vîry-lnt, vîr-)
adj.

1.a. Extremely infectious, malignant, or poisonous. Used of a disease or toxin.
b. Capable of causing disease by breaking down protective mechanisms of the host. Used of a pathogen.
2. Bitterly hostile or antagonistic; hateful: virulent criticism. See Synonyms at poisonous.
3. Intensely irritating, obnoxious, or harsh.

To not be virulent would mean, it isn't ANY of the above.

If you had any science background you would realize that the testing methods used in 1985 are not as advanced as exist now (which may be part of the reason there are no modern studies supporting this).

For all we know the were detecting viri ghosts (the remaining shells of viruses).

Still waiting for you to answer the fucking question shit for brains, u still think you will live with a pure water IV?

Seeing as you are putting words into the mouths of the people who did that study my saying the moon is a illusion of my mind that everyone can see (based on that study) is just as vaild as what you have said.

BTW my illusion is going to come crash on your face now.

http://doityourself.com/photos/feces.gif

Onnotango is a "race card" retard who says lots of dumb shit
Critter is a stupid and annoying bitch
LockNTross doesnt seem bad to me, whatever...
Juggernaut is a grade A moron

:lol: 1985 article. Yeah, nothing's changed in AIDS reserach since 1985...

Appl Environ Microbiol 1993 May;59(5):1437-43
Survival of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), HIV-infected lymphocytes, and poliovirus in water.

Moore BE.

Department of Microbiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-1019.

"In addition, blood from stage IV AIDS patients was introduced into tap water, and the recovery of HIV was monitored by using both an infectivity assay and polymerase chain reaction amplification of viral sequences. Virally infected cells were no longer detectable after 5 min in dechlorinated tap water, while little diminution in amplifiable sequences was observed over 2 h. Thus, detection of viral sequences by polymerase chain reaction technology should not be equated with risk of exposure to infectious HIV."

Mind you, this was in dechlorinated water, that was left stagnant at room temperature.

http://www.polarworld.com/images/feces.jpg

Originally posted by [Rogue]MiScHiEf
This thread is now about fecal matter:

http://www.animaladvocates.com/images/PROPOSAL%20TO%20BAN%20CHA NING/Vanc,%20old%20shepherd%20 and%20feces.jpg

------------------------------------------------------------
But that's what this thread has always been about, right? :confused:

http://cartalk.cars.com/About/BirdPoop/you-dont-know-poop.jpg

http://www.yourparrotplace.com/images/poop-off_32_250.jpg

http://members.aol.com/SGard87572/poop.gif