Scientists: Kyoto protocol a 'failure'

JoMo

Veteran XX
Kyoto Isn't Working, Prepare For Climate Change, Say Scientists

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...FOAVCBQUIV0?xml=/news/2006/09/04/nkyoto04.xml
The Kyoto agreement to cut greenhouse emissions is "ineffectual" and the world should prepare for the effects of climate change, the nation's biggest general science meeting will be told tonight.

Developing drought-tolerant crops, constructing flood defences, improving building insulation or banning building close to sea level are as important as cutting emissions, according to Frances Cairncross, the president of the British Association and chairman of the Economic and Social Research Council.

"We need more sheltered public spaces. It is going to be either sunnier or rainier," she says. Plants, insects and animals that need to migrate north away from hotter climates should be provided with species corridors, among many other measures.

"Adaptation policies have had far less attention than mitigation, and that is a mistake," says Miss Cairncross. "We need to think now about policies that prepare for a hotter, drier world."

Miss Cairncross says the Kyoto agreement to cut greenhouse gas emissions is having little impact. India and China, representing a third of humanity, have not signed up and the United States "does not take any notice".

Developing a successful global deal will mean "persuading this generation to accept sacrifices on behalf of posterity; and persuading countries that will gain from climate change, or lose little, to take action not on behalf of their own grandchildren but of the descendants of people in other nations".

"We cannot relocate the Amazon or insulate coral reefs — so we need mitigation too. But the Government could and should put in place an adaptation strategy right away."

Despite the arguments about the mix between renewables, nuclear and fossil fuels, the bottom line is that, "with present technologies, no combination of existing energy sources can conceivably bring about the reductions in energy use that we need, or at least, not without a disruption that is politically unimaginable".

Extreme rainfall has become more frequent and intense over the past 40 years in parts of Britain, particularly in Scotland and the North of England. Scientists from Newcastle University, who analysed UK weather records from 1961 to 2000, say the findings provide further evidence of climate change.

They also suggest that the five million people who live near rivers — 10 per cent of the UK population — can expect to be flooded with increasing regularity in the future, which has implications for the management of flooding and water resources.

• The Festival of Science is at the University of East Anglia and across the city of Norwich from Sept 2 to 9
 
Saw that one coming. :rolleyes:

But I dislike the fact that scientists are still citing such short periods (40 years?) in their research. The Earth is billions of years old, guys. Let's be realistic.
 
Saw that one coming. :rolleyes:

But I dislike the fact that scientists are still citing such short periods (40 years?) in their research. The Earth is billions of years old, guys. Let's be realistic.

Well we just don't have accurate ...Data 8p and lets face it just like "Entertainment Tonight" news is taking over...it gets them press as well. Predictions of long ago is an interpretation of tree rings and such.
 
Didn't need to look to know this was posted by JoMo.
 
We have climate data from at least the last 100 years. Probably longer. The mercury thermometer was invented in 1714.

If we're going to talk about climate change, let's at least look at whole periods we have measurements for, not the last 40 years. Christ...
 
Back
Top