Yamato was sunk en route to Okinawa. It was going to beach itself on one of the islands to function as a giant coastal fortress until it was destroyed.FuFu said:what happened to the yamato? i've always thought the bismarck/whats it called were the biggest battleships, and they got chased down by those brit planes ?
Kurayami said:Yamato was sunk en route to Okinawa. It was going to beach itself on one of the islands to function as a giant coastal fortress until it was destroyed.
It had two sister ships:
Musashi was sunk in 1944.
Shinano was converted into an aircraft carrier. It was sunk by a single US submarine (USS Archerfish, if I recall) en route to another shipyard. It hadn't been fully armored yet.
Bismark and Tirpitz were gigantic ships, but they were not as big as the Yamato. One of the strikes on the Tirpitz on the Norwegian coast was one of the few (if not only) documented times that US carrier-based planes (specifically F6Fs and F4Us) came up against the Luftwaffe mainstays (Me-109, FW-190.)
That month it was resolved to deploy the battleship for what was essentially a suicide mission to support the defence of Okinawa where, having insufficient fuel for a return trip, she was to be beached as a stationary battery. The Special Surface Attack Force as it was known, consisting of the battleship, accompanied by the light cruiser Yahagi and eight destroyers, sailed from Tokuyama on 6 April bound for Okinawa. Next day, US carrier aircraft began their attacks and Yamato fired special AA shells from her 18in guns. Before she sank, the battleship is believed to have received hits from eleven, possibly thirteen, torpedoes and eight (confirmed) bombs in the space of a little more than an hour and a quarter. After a final huge explosion, she went down about 130nm WSW of Kagoshima. Yahagi and four of the destroyers were also lost.
And what?MADness said:And....?
Don't leave us hanging (or digging through our history books)
there werent enough troops because hitlerbush sent them all to iraqMADness said:One of you history buffs want to explain to me why we had an abundance of pilots during the end of the war in the pacific?
Was it people coming over from Europe or was it a lack of planes or were we just dominate in the air?
FireStorm! said:there werent enough troops because hitlerbush sent them all to iraq
nap time :]
Because the US had a large population and an incredible production capacity. Remember, the US had fielded around fifty aircraft carriers by the end of the war. The Japanese didn't even manage 20 (I believe the number was 16, but I may be wrong.) Couple that with a huge population that could be trained very carefully and without any threat of attack and the capacity to produce tens of thousands of aircraft...MADness said:One of you history buffs want to explain to me why we had an abundance of pilots during the end of the war in the pacific?
Was it people coming over from Europe or was it a lack of planes or were we just dominate in the air?
I don't think there was any one reason. I'd attribute it to the fact that attrition was not that high by the end of the war and that the US was gearing up for an amphibious invasion of Japan throughout the second half of the war. That was expected to cost at least 1,000,000 American lives, so it would make sense to ensure that you have a surplus of trained people in advance. Grunts are easy to replace. Pilots aren't.MADness said:Hilarious troll attempt.
Seriously though, it wasn't about troops, it was about pilots. And there were too many pilots, not enough.
My grandfather was never able to ship out because they had more pilots than planes so they made him stay in the states and be a flight instructor. Never thought to ask him why there was a mismatch between personnel and equipment.
Saburo Sakai - Samurai!zodie said:Kura who was that one Japanese pilot you said you read a book on?