Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere Fun Hour

Kurayami

Banned
As requested.


IJN Yamato (still the largest warship ever built)

1096214972965.jpg


1096215159966.jpg


:(

h62582.jpg



Mitsubishi G4M (Betty)

G4M-28.jpg


G4M-50s.jpg


"Surrender Betty"

Surrender%20Betty08.jpg


H8K (Emily)

H8K-2.jpg


H8K-3s.jpg


H8K-21.jpg


J8M Shusui

J8M-2.jpg


J8M-9.jpg


Kikka

Kikka-2s.jpg


Kikka-7.jpg


Kikka-25.jpg
 
what happened to the yamato? i've always thought the bismarck/whats it called were the biggest battleships, and they got chased down by those brit planes ?
 
FuFu said:
what happened to the yamato? i've always thought the bismarck/whats it called were the biggest battleships, and they got chased down by those brit planes ?
Yamato was sunk en route to Okinawa. It was going to beach itself on one of the islands to function as a giant coastal fortress until it was destroyed.

It had two sister ships:

Musashi was sunk in 1944.

Shinano was converted into an aircraft carrier. It was sunk by a single US submarine (USS Archerfish, if I recall) en route to another shipyard. It hadn't been fully armored yet.


Bismark and Tirpitz were gigantic ships, but they were not as big as the Yamato. One of the strikes on the Tirpitz on the Norwegian coast was one of the few (if not only) documented times that US carrier-based planes (specifically F6Fs and F4Us) came up against the Luftwaffe mainstays (Me-109, FW-190.)
 
Kurayami said:
Yamato was sunk en route to Okinawa. It was going to beach itself on one of the islands to function as a giant coastal fortress until it was destroyed.

It had two sister ships:

Musashi was sunk in 1944.

Shinano was converted into an aircraft carrier. It was sunk by a single US submarine (USS Archerfish, if I recall) en route to another shipyard. It hadn't been fully armored yet.


Bismark and Tirpitz were gigantic ships, but they were not as big as the Yamato. One of the strikes on the Tirpitz on the Norwegian coast was one of the few (if not only) documented times that US carrier-based planes (specifically F6Fs and F4Us) came up against the Luftwaffe mainstays (Me-109, FW-190.)


And....?

Don't leave us hanging (or digging through our history books)
 
Thought they scuttled the Yamamoto in shallow water to create a battle platform.

Just Googled it, she was sunk after an enormous amount of damage.

That month it was resolved to deploy the battleship for what was essentially a suicide mission to support the defence of Okinawa where, having insufficient fuel for a return trip, she was to be beached as a stationary battery. The Special Surface Attack Force as it was known, consisting of the battleship, accompanied by the light cruiser Yahagi and eight destroyers, sailed from Tokuyama on 6 April bound for Okinawa. Next day, US carrier aircraft began their attacks and Yamato fired special AA shells from her 18in guns. Before she sank, the battleship is believed to have received hits from eleven, possibly thirteen, torpedoes and eight (confirmed) bombs in the space of a little more than an hour and a quarter. After a final huge explosion, she went down about 130nm WSW of Kagoshima. Yahagi and four of the destroyers were also lost.
 
MADness said:
And....?

Don't leave us hanging (or digging through our history books)
And what? :p

Yamato was sunk by American naval planes (like pretty much every other major Japanese warship.)

Tirpitz got the shit kicked out of it numerous times by mostly British aircraft and spent most of its life either hiding or being repaired in port. It was eventually sunk by specially designed armor-piercing bombs. It weathered strikes from well over a thousand aircraft throughout its life, if I recall.

Bismark was sunk at sea by British warships in one of the few interesting naval engagements of the war (Leyte Gulf beats it hands down, though. Not only was it the largest naval battle in history, but it had the Yamato chasing down a fleet of unescorted destroyers and escort carriers. :p The carriers actually had to turn towards the Japanese fleet to launch their planes. The destroyers made almost suicidal torpedo runs to cover them.)
 
One of you history buffs want to explain to me why we had an abundance of pilots during the end of the war in the pacific?

Was it people coming over from Europe or was it a lack of planes or were we just dominate in the air?
 
Probably...15 years ago I read a few books about the pacific naval battles. Really interesting stuff (though I don't remember much of it anymore).
 
MADness said:
One of you history buffs want to explain to me why we had an abundance of pilots during the end of the war in the pacific?

Was it people coming over from Europe or was it a lack of planes or were we just dominate in the air?
there werent enough troops because hitlerbush sent them all to iraq

nap time :]
 
FireStorm! said:
there werent enough troops because hitlerbush sent them all to iraq

nap time :]

Hilarious troll attempt.

Seriously though, it wasn't about troops, it was about pilots. And there were too many pilots, not enough.

My grandfather was never able to ship out because they had more pilots than planes so they made him stay in the states and be a flight instructor. Never thought to ask him why there was a mismatch between personnel and equipment.
 
MADness said:
One of you history buffs want to explain to me why we had an abundance of pilots during the end of the war in the pacific?

Was it people coming over from Europe or was it a lack of planes or were we just dominate in the air?
Because the US had a large population and an incredible production capacity. Remember, the US had fielded around fifty aircraft carriers by the end of the war. The Japanese didn't even manage 20 (I believe the number was 16, but I may be wrong.) Couple that with a huge population that could be trained very carefully and without any threat of attack and the capacity to produce tens of thousands of aircraft...

Another reason was that American pilots tended to survive much longer than Japanese pilots. Japanese pilots didn't get leave or transfers to rear areas for rest (for the most part.) They flew until they died. As time went on, the vast majority of the great Japanese pilots were killed and replaced with rookies who could barely fly let alone fight. The Japanese never recovered from the loss of their pilots at Midway. As such, experience on the US side continually increased while attrition decreased.

That said, the Imperial Japanese Navy undoubtably had the best pilots in the world in 1941. The problem was that they were all dead by 1945.
 
MADness said:
Hilarious troll attempt.

Seriously though, it wasn't about troops, it was about pilots. And there were too many pilots, not enough.

My grandfather was never able to ship out because they had more pilots than planes so they made him stay in the states and be a flight instructor. Never thought to ask him why there was a mismatch between personnel and equipment.
I don't think there was any one reason. I'd attribute it to the fact that attrition was not that high by the end of the war and that the US was gearing up for an amphibious invasion of Japan throughout the second half of the war. That was expected to cost at least 1,000,000 American lives, so it would make sense to ensure that you have a surplus of trained people in advance. Grunts are easy to replace. Pilots aren't.
 
cool. when i find something else to order off of amazon to put me into the 25$ free shipping range im going to pick it up.
 
Back
Top