Did tribes die because everyone was too busy proclaiming it dead instead of playing?

T

Tribalbob

Contributor

Veteran XV

• Jan 21, 2005

• #1

More on this at 11!

 

P

Paladin-5

Veteran XX

• Jan 21, 2005

• #2

hmmm

 

C

CoNsT|PiScES

Banned

• Jan 21, 2005

• #3

 

C

Crom

Veteran X

• Jan 21, 2005

• #4

the answer is definitely maybe or maybe not

 

J

justin

Contributor

Veteran X

• Jan 21, 2005

• #5

god shutup and go hump your broken spacebar.

 

G

gibsonic

Veteran X

• Jan 21, 2005

• #6

Crom said:

the answer is definitely maybe or maybe not

Click to expand...

yes with a possibility of no.

 

C

Crom

Veteran X

• Jan 21, 2005

• #7

gibsonic said:

yes with a possibility of no.

Click to expand...

uncertainly no with a definitive lack of a concrete yes

 

B

Bridude

Veteran XV

• Jan 21, 2005

• #8

Click Me

 

T

Tribalbob

Contributor

Veteran XV

• Jan 21, 2005

• #9

studies show that 90% of the people don't agree with the other 10%

 

O

olaf

Veteran X

• Jan 21, 2005

• #10

I love your logic. We say its dead because we don't play it. And now its only dead because we say it is.

Way to make a retard point.

 

S

slogg

Contributor

Veteran XX

• Jan 21, 2005

• #11

shug knight killed Tribes

 

T

Tribalbob

Contributor

Veteran XV

• Jan 21, 2005

• #12

KombatWombat said:

I love your logic. We say its dead because we don't play it. And now its only dead because we say it is.

Way to make a retard point.

Click to expand...

It is a good thing that you have come into this thread to refute my point, I don't know what would have happened if i had kept on seriously believing in that foolishness.