Third parties beat Bush in global vote

blackie420rx

he with no title++
Veteran XV
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/11/01/election.virtual.vote.reut/

Kerry tops Bush in virtual vote
Monday, November 1, 2004 Posted: 1321 GMT (2121 HKT)

LONDON, England (Reuters) -- Democratic challenger John Kerry has won a landslide victory over President George W. Bush in a global sample of the world's opinion on the race for the White House.

More than 113,000 people from 119 countries made their choice at www.globalvote2004.org, handing Kerry a crushing win with 77 percent of the vote, a spokesman for the Web site said on Monday.

But there was consolation for Bush from what many would see as an unlikely source: the majority of virtual votes submitted from Iraq went to the incumbent.

The results of the non-official vote were released a day before Americans go to the polls in the real election.

Opinion polls in the United States predict a dead heat between Bush and Kerry on Tuesday, but surfers who had their say at Globalvote leaned strongly towards the challenger.

Third party candidates, including independent Ralph Nader, took nearly 14 percent of the vote, while Bush garnered a mere nine percent.

"Iraq was one of the few countries where Bush actually won and the Middle East voted 37 percent for Bush compared to a world average of 9.1 percent,'' the Web site spokesman said.

"We're not trying to tell Americans how to vote, we're just giving them feedback from the rest of the world. The outcome of the real vote affects non-US citizens enormously in the post-9/11 age,'' he added.

Globalvote is a non-partisan, London-based site and not sponsored by any political party, its creators said.


Cliffs:Kerry-77%, 3rd parties-14%, Bush 9%
Iraq voted for Bush
The middle east voted for Bush more than the rest of the world, but he still lost there.
 
I think the vast majority of the online voters in the middle east were westerners, alot of them were probably Americans stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
 
coombz said:
because of the unfailing arrogance of most americans
Yes, it sure is arrogant to think that the world's opinion has no effect on who we elect president.

So limey, when did you cast your imaginary US ballot that doesn't exist?
 
think343 said:
Good thing the globe doesn't fucking matter in US Presidential elections.

Well, you know that Bush is in bed with Saudi Arabia right?

Fighting a war on terror while having family ties with the Saudis and Bin Ladens, ROFLMAO
 
the people who have internet access in iraq are probably the ones most likely to benefit from the war
 
Yankee said:
good thing we dont give a FUCK what the world thinks....
Now Yankee, stop disenfranchising all the French, Germans, terrorists and whatnot who have an interest...you need to be more humble and sensitive to their likes and dislikes because we want to be inclusive of every swinging dipshit on the planet, regardless of their agenda.

:roller:
 
stfupoint.gif
 
ChiNa said:
I think the vast majority of the online voters in the middle east were westerners, alot of them were probably Americans stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
i would imagine any internet access given to our soldiers wasn't on some iraqi ISP.
 
Back
Top