Forget those Bush Campaign Commercials-- MoveOn knows how to do ads -->

Miracle · Dec 9, 2003

Stone may think that the Bush ad is the best thing since sliced bread -- but this jobs down the toilet for the first time since the great depresison and the Grinch Santa ads from MoveOn put the Bush marketing team to shame.

Maybe those democrats actually had something worth being angry about--and so might the rest of you.

stone · Dec 9, 2003

"MoveOn" - so ironic on so many levels.

Anyhoo, I wish that they'd saturate every single market with their ads.

Blumie · Dec 9, 2003

stone said:
"MoveOn" - so ironic on so many levels.

Anyhoo, I wish that they'd saturate every single market with their ads.

Kurayami · Dec 9, 2003

Remember: Miracle is named that because it is a "miracle" that he hasn't managed to kill himself with common household objects yet.

Xcursion · Dec 9, 2003

Better than the Bush ad.

triple · Dec 9, 2003

I think both suck. First off, the bush cam doing a negative ad about negative ads is just.. uh.. odd. Pot, meet kettle. And moveon, well.. they don't really live up to their name.

(And if I was a democrat, I sure as fuck wouldn't be bitching about how the economy is supposedly sucking)

scy7he · Dec 9, 2003

The Bush add sucks. "People are attacking your president! At least he's leading!"

But the last time I checked many of the Democratic canidates are also elected representatives... that are also leading. :shrug:

Miracle · Dec 9, 2003

Besides. Everybody knows that this is the Bush Campaign's real website. Stone got the suffix wrong.

Kurayami · Dec 9, 2003

Miracle said:
Besides. Everybody knows that this is the Bush Campaign's real website. Stone got the suffix wrong.

Try not to choke on your tongue.

triple · Dec 9, 2003

scy7he said:
The Bush add sucks. "People are attacking your president! At least he's leading!"

But the last time I checked many of the Democratic canidates are also elected representatives... that are also leading.

actually dean isnt leading anything right now except the polls

scy7he · Dec 9, 2003

triple said:
actually dean isnt leading anything right now except the polls

Actually? Funny, I don't remember talking about Dean... oh... lol, stupid me. I Wasn't.

fartiusstinkius · Dec 9, 2003

how come both movies don't finish? i want closure dammit!

triple · Dec 9, 2003

scy7he said:
Actually? Funny, I don't remember talking about Dean... oh... lol, stupid me. I Wasn't.

yea, I mean when talking about the candidates, lets ignore the one whos in first with a 30 something point lead.

I know some are currently leading. But its really just insignificant considering none of them actually have a chance.

scy7he · Dec 9, 2003

triple said:
yea, I mean when talking about the candidates, lets ignore the one whos in first with a 30 something point lead.

Where was I ignoring him? I was talking about Dem Canidates. Every time I say that I have to talk about Dean? So I guess every time I talk about Republicans I have to talk about Bush?

triple · Dec 9, 2003

Every time you say that you have to talk about dean? No, but don't blame me for assuming you are considering he is the frontrunner by far..

fartiusstinkius · Dec 9, 2003

triple said:
Every time you say that you have to talk about dean? No, but don't blame me for assuming you are considering he is the frontrunner by far..

actually you and only you are to blame for your assumption

scy7he · Dec 9, 2003

triple said:
Every time you say that you have to talk about dean? No, but don't blame me for assuming you are considering he is the frontrunner by far..

You got it. I won't blame you for assuming that... I am considering that he is the front runner... by far.

triple · Dec 9, 2003

fartiusstinkius said:
actually you and only you are to blame for your assumption

yea, ok. silly me. thinking that it was just a tiny bit relevant to his point that the lead candidate, leading by 30 points, is not currently in charge of anything..

im not gonna argue this. just take it for what it is.

fartiusstinkius · Dec 9, 2003

triple said:
yea, ok. silly me. thinking that it was just a tiny bit relevant to his point that the lead candidate, leading by 30 points, is not currently in charge of anything..

im not gonna argue this. just take it for what it is.

i'm not saying it was a bad assumption. i'm simply saying that you are responsible for your assumptions no matter how reasonable they seem to be.

marantz · Dec 9, 2003

i cant believe that people honestly blame Bush for the loss of jobs in this country since 9/11. just goes to show how fucking moronic the american public is i guess

Forget those Bush Campaign Commercials-- MoveOn knows how to do ads -->

More options

Miracle

stone

A Democrat for Life²

Blumie

Banned

Kurayami

Banned

Xcursion

triple

scy7he

Miracle

Kurayami

Banned

triple

scy7he

fartiusstinkius

triple

scy7he

triple

fartiusstinkius

scy7he

triple

fartiusstinkius

marantz

Audiophile³