Who wants more civillian casualties?

if we're talkin about those fuckmo's that are dressed like civilians and ambushing our troops, then yes
 
but i belive that in the neighborhood our cruise missiles hit today the civs were just hiding not attacking our troops
 
CloroX said:
gotta kill all civilians just to be sure :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

that's the thing, you can't tell until they're already firing on you, so we pretty much have to shoot first

if they weren't breaking the rules it'd be a lot easier on their civilians :(
 
xpdnc said:
if we're talkin about those fuckmo's that are dressed like civilians and ambushing our troops, then yes
Click to expand...
And to th innocent ones, sorry. We can't trust the people that look like civilians anymore. Thank your fellow countrymen.
 
verticle said:
but i belive that in the neighborhood our cruise missiles hit today the civs were just hiding not attacking our troops
Click to expand...
True, they were hiding in close proximity to ground-to-air missile batteries that their government put there....
 
Ben Reed said:
There's no badder juju in the already terrible process known as war than wishing for more civilian casualties.
Click to expand...

Civilian casualties that result in a manner of conducting war that protects our troops from harm (bombing instead of ground assaults) can be wished for.
 
no, there's no worse juju than using your own civilians as shields to fight a losing battle
 
xpdnc said:
that's the thing, you can't tell until they're already firing on you, so we pretty much have to shoot first

if they weren't breaking the rules it'd be a lot easier on their civilians :(
Click to expand...

way to place the blame on someone else. So is the liberation mission now just a "take over baghdad" mission?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top