Sir Lucius
Veteran XX
There's absolutly NO way to objectivly argue an objective argument.
The totally objective argument thread.
- Thread starter Sir Lucius
- Start date
Sir Lucius
Veteran XX
I can argue a subjective arguement objectivly, but I cannot argue an objective arguement objectivly
Example:
1: I hate pie
2: Pie can be made with apples which contains vitamins helpful to the body.
1: Pi has an infinate repeating decimal
2: I fucking hate pie!
Example:
1: I hate pie
2: Pie can be made with apples which contains vitamins helpful to the body.
1: Pi has an infinate repeating decimal
2: I fucking hate pie!
Last edited:
Sir Lucius
Veteran XX
Are you trying to tell me I'm wrong?Error|550 said:If it were totally objective, there could be no argument.
I think our ship just crashed into a pair of docks.
Haha you're wrong! I figured it out. You can argue an objective argument by arguing the validity of its objectiveness!
Example:
Objective argument - Waterfalls exist because of gravity pulling the water to the Earth's center of gravity.
BlueCream - Bullshit. Tiny, invisible trolls drag the water down. Prove me wrong.
Argument ensues.
Example:
Objective argument - Waterfalls exist because of gravity pulling the water to the Earth's center of gravity.
BlueCream - Bullshit. Tiny, invisible trolls drag the water down. Prove me wrong.
Argument ensues.