Tribal Imperialist
11-20-2003, 12:46
Congo, Iran, and the United States of America.
There are only three countries in the world that execute teenagers.Tribal Imperialist 11-20-2003, 12:46 Congo, Iran, and the United States of America. JustinCase 11-20-2003, 12:47 we do? :huh: nigafool 11-20-2003, 12:48 not that i agree with the death penalty but exactly what point are you trying to make? Tribal Imperialist 11-20-2003, 12:49 we do? :huh: Eight since 1998. You know that common phrase, "will be tried as an adult?" Code4 11-20-2003, 12:49 Please list anyone executed that was under the age of 19. Zombie 11-20-2003, 12:49 So what, we kill teenagers, BFD. we kill babies too. nigafool 11-20-2003, 12:50 oh i get it "the united states is hopelessly barbaric!" posts tribal imperialist from his mommies warm house while eating his mommies warm food and typing on mommies expensive computer Ceiling_Fan 11-20-2003, 12:51 Teenagers are ****ing annoying. We should kill more of them. [PoE]BigBrown 11-20-2003, 12:51 Please list anyone executed that was under the age of 19. Are you arguing that holding them in prison until after they are 19 and then executing them is not executing a teenager? triple 11-20-2003, 12:52 I turn 19 tommorow. rok MadBoFo 11-20-2003, 12:53 Please list anyone executed that was under the age of 19. yes please do that triballiberaltreehuggingh ippu******. Raven 11-20-2003, 12:53 well, it isnt bigbrown. executing is when you die, right? so your 18 and they say "your dead" and then you die when your 22 or something... how is that executing a teenager Glare 11-20-2003, 12:53 ill execute tribal imperialist for 10 bucks and a slurpee Saggs 11-20-2003, 12:54 Please list anyone executed that was under the age of 19. :signed: daxMaximum 11-20-2003, 12:54 BigBrown']Are you arguing that holding them in prison until after they are 19 and then executing them is not executing a teenager? There is no argument. from the ages of 13-19 these are the "teenage" years. He should be held until he is 20 then executed. Then and only then are you wrong. K-Rex 11-20-2003, 12:55 Teenagers are ****ing annoying. We should kill more of them. Simple, sweet and to the point. :mother****ingsigned: JustinCase 11-20-2003, 12:56 who cares, if you're a teenager you're old enough to know that killing someone is very, very wrong Code4 11-20-2003, 12:56 BigBrown']Are you arguing that holding them in prison until after they are 19 and then executing them is not executing a teenager? Being that they aren't a teenager when they are executed, then yes his statwement is factually incorrect. Not to mention it usually takes a good 10 years for the appels process. Also if someone commits a crime that is deemed worthy of the death penalty then we're probably better off without them. Unless you'd be willing to keep them in your house of course. stone 11-20-2003, 12:56 Lee Malvo needs to get Malvo'd in the head by the Commonwealth of Virginia. triple 11-20-2003, 12:56 Congo, Iran, and the United States of America. btw usually a state handles executions unless its a federal crime, of course or im completely wrong, either way |
|