Locke355
04-05-2003, 05:59
Weapons should have skill.
That is all.
That is all.
No rocket launcher in t3 pleaseLocke355 04-05-2003, 05:59 Weapons should have skill. That is all. Keyser 04-05-2003, 06:13 quit trying to bring back t1 you elitist t1 player you Sir Lucius 04-05-2003, 06:15 Replace it with a bashful hummingbird with a bifocal and top hat. He'll buzz around your enemies spelling out patterns with soap bubble trails he shoots from his tail. We'll call him Sir Humbleton and he'll be the governer of Bumburble -- kidnapped in a vicious plot by an irate weasel sneaky bloodhound. Only there's no way in dogwater they'll get away with this loopy scheme! ho ho ho! It'd be less silly that way. Locke355 04-05-2003, 06:26 Replace it with a bashful hummingbird with a bifocal and top hat. He'll buzz around your enemies spelling out patterns with soap bubble trails he shoots from his tail. We'll call him Sir Humbleton and he'll be the governer of Bumburble -- kidnapped in a vicious plot by an irate weasel sneaky bloodhound. Only there's no way in dogwater they'll get away with this loopy scheme! ho ho ho! It'd be less sill that way. :rofl: Golgac 04-05-2003, 06:42 Depends on if vehicles are overpowering or not. Rocket launchers should just be for taking down vehicles, not people. So basically tone down the vehicles so that there will be no need for the rocket launchers. snow 04-05-2003, 07:52 no rocket launchers or vechiles filsinger 04-05-2003, 10:22 they've stated that there will be vehicles, but they wont be made mandatory Colosus 04-05-2003, 12:05 Replace it with a bashful hummingbird with a bifocal and top hat. He'll buzz around your enemies spelling out patterns with soap bubble trails he shoots from his tail. We'll call him Sir Humbleton and he'll be the governer of Bumburble -- kidnapped in a vicious plot by an irate weasel sneaky bloodhound. Only there's no way in dogwater they'll get away with this loopy scheme! ho ho ho! It'd be less silly that way. :lol: :rofl: Hilarious TheGhost 04-05-2003, 13:58 no rocket launchers or vechiles we gotta have rocket launchers if theres vehicles, and marweas already said (or thrax) there will be... It would be hard as hell to kill a shrike with no rockets, if the shrike is coming at you at least you can rocket it now, if its flyin away no chance in hell, but its a "necessary evil" right now, for balancing issues. Sanchez 04-05-2003, 14:07 rocket turrets, not rocket launchers. :hitit2: BlueCream 04-05-2003, 16:02 no rocket launchers or vechiles signed Locke355 04-05-2003, 16:04 having vehicles does not mean you need rockets. Wulfen 04-05-2003, 16:20 Replace it with a bashful hummingbird with a bifocal and top hat. He'll buzz around your enemies spelling out patterns with soap bubble trails he shoots from his tail. We'll call him Sir Humbleton and he'll be the governer of Bumburble -- kidnapped in a vicious plot by an irate weasel sneaky bloodhound. Only there's no way in dogwater they'll get away with this loopy scheme! ho ho ho! It'd be less silly that way. Sorry bro, Nintendo has that copyrighted. Golgac 04-05-2003, 16:24 having vehicles does not mean you need rockets. This is true. However if the vehicles are anything like t2 base was the vehicles would be ridiculously overpowered (again). The most fun games I ever had in t1 and t2 (classic) has at a very very minimum vehicles. I certainly wouldn't be sad to see them just scrap vehicles. Dutch 04-05-2003, 16:33 rocket launchers would be alright if they could not be used to lock onto players having to carry "flare" grenades at all times was stupid JerryGarcia 04-05-2003, 16:35 ^^ditto no locking on players you can shoot the players but no locking would be best. Beren 04-05-2003, 17:30 rocket turrets, not rocket launchers. :hitit2: Xagothae.1 04-05-2003, 17:58 we gotta have rocket launchers if theres vehicles, and marweas already said (or thrax) there will be... It would be hard as hell to kill a shrike with no rockets, if the shrike is coming at you at least you can rocket it now, if its flyin away no chance in hell, but its a "necessary evil" right now, for balancing issues. I believe he was joking... R@ND0M 04-05-2003, 21:38 I call dibs on using Sir Humbleton first >:\ Thrax Panda 04-05-2003, 21:44 we gotta have rocket launchers if theres vehicles, and marweas already said (or thrax) there will be...Just for fun let's examine that comment, shall we?. Yes, lets. T1. Vehicles. No Rocket launcher. Not once did I hear LoLnOw or Vox ***** about the lack of a rocket launcher. So, you can have vehicles and no rocket launcher. |
|