No rocket launcher in t3 please

Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6

Locke355
04-05-2003, 05:59
Weapons should have skill.

That is all.

Keyser
04-05-2003, 06:13
quit trying to bring back t1 you elitist t1 player you

Sir Lucius
04-05-2003, 06:15
Replace it with a bashful hummingbird with a bifocal and top hat. He'll buzz around your enemies spelling out patterns with soap bubble trails he shoots from his tail. We'll call him Sir Humbleton and he'll be the governer of Bumburble -- kidnapped in a vicious plot by an irate weasel sneaky bloodhound. Only there's no way in dogwater they'll get away with this loopy scheme! ho ho ho!


It'd be less silly that way.

Locke355
04-05-2003, 06:26
Replace it with a bashful hummingbird with a bifocal and top hat. He'll buzz around your enemies spelling out patterns with soap bubble trails he shoots from his tail. We'll call him Sir Humbleton and he'll be the governer of Bumburble -- kidnapped in a vicious plot by an irate weasel sneaky bloodhound. Only there's no way in dogwater they'll get away with this loopy scheme! ho ho ho!


It'd be less sill that way.

:rofl:

Golgac
04-05-2003, 06:42
Depends on if vehicles are overpowering or not. Rocket launchers should just be for taking down vehicles, not people.

So basically tone down the vehicles so that there will be no need for the rocket launchers.

snow
04-05-2003, 07:52
no rocket launchers or vechiles

filsinger
04-05-2003, 10:22
they've stated that there will be vehicles, but they wont be made mandatory

Colosus
04-05-2003, 12:05
Replace it with a bashful hummingbird with a bifocal and top hat. He'll buzz around your enemies spelling out patterns with soap bubble trails he shoots from his tail. We'll call him Sir Humbleton and he'll be the governer of Bumburble -- kidnapped in a vicious plot by an irate weasel sneaky bloodhound. Only there's no way in dogwater they'll get away with this loopy scheme! ho ho ho!


It'd be less silly that way.

:lol: :rofl:

Hilarious

TheGhost
04-05-2003, 13:58
no rocket launchers or vechiles

we gotta have rocket launchers if theres vehicles, and marweas already said (or thrax) there will be...


It would be hard as hell to kill a shrike with no rockets, if the shrike is coming at you at least you can rocket it now, if its flyin away no chance in hell, but its a "necessary evil" right now, for balancing issues.

Sanchez
04-05-2003, 14:07
rocket turrets, not rocket launchers. :hitit2:

BlueCream
04-05-2003, 16:02
no rocket launchers or vechiles

signed

Locke355
04-05-2003, 16:04
having vehicles does not mean you need rockets.

Wulfen
04-05-2003, 16:20
Replace it with a bashful hummingbird with a bifocal and top hat. He'll buzz around your enemies spelling out patterns with soap bubble trails he shoots from his tail. We'll call him Sir Humbleton and he'll be the governer of Bumburble -- kidnapped in a vicious plot by an irate weasel sneaky bloodhound. Only there's no way in dogwater they'll get away with this loopy scheme! ho ho ho!


It'd be less silly that way.

Sorry bro, Nintendo has that copyrighted.

Golgac
04-05-2003, 16:24
having vehicles does not mean you need rockets.

This is true. However if the vehicles are anything like t2 base was the vehicles would be ridiculously overpowered (again).

The most fun games I ever had in t1 and t2 (classic) has at a very very minimum vehicles. I certainly wouldn't be sad to see them just scrap vehicles.

Dutch
04-05-2003, 16:33
rocket launchers would be alright if they could not be used to lock onto players

having to carry "flare" grenades at all times was stupid

JerryGarcia
04-05-2003, 16:35
^^ditto
no locking on players you can shoot the players but no locking would be best.

Beren
04-05-2003, 17:30
rocket turrets, not rocket launchers. :hitit2:

Xagothae.1
04-05-2003, 17:58
we gotta have rocket launchers if theres vehicles, and marweas already said (or thrax) there will be...


It would be hard as hell to kill a shrike with no rockets, if the shrike is coming at you at least you can rocket it now, if its flyin away no chance in hell, but its a "necessary evil" right now, for balancing issues.

I believe he was joking...

R@ND0M
04-05-2003, 21:38
I call dibs on using Sir Humbleton first >:\

Thrax Panda
04-05-2003, 21:44
we gotta have rocket launchers if theres vehicles, and marweas already said (or thrax) there will be...Just for fun let's examine that comment, shall we?. Yes, lets.

T1. Vehicles. No Rocket launcher. Not once did I hear LoLnOw or Vox ***** about the lack of a rocket launcher. So, you can have vehicles and no rocket launcher.